The Washington Post

Arizona’s ‘super extreme DUI’ and how we measure impaired driving in the U.S.

(Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP)

Here is a little news out of Arizona involving driving under the influence. From the Arizona Republic:

Phoenix Suns player P.J. Tucker was arrested for “super extreme DUI” in May by Scottsdale police.

A “super extreme DUI,” you say? What makes this particular DUI so super or extreme? More from the Arizona Republic:

Tucker’s blood alcohol content registered at .201 on a preliminary breath test in the field on May 10, according to Scottsdale police. A driver is considered legally drunk for a DUI charge in Arizona at .08 blood-alcohol content.

A blood test administered after Tucker was taken to jail and later analyzed by Arizona DPS showed his blood alcohol-content to be .222, according to the police report.

Okay, so that is particularly extreme. (Tucker, meanwhile, who spent the last two seasons with the Phoenix Suns, was re-signed to a multi-season contract last week.) But why does Arizona have such a designation? And what actually happens to drivers when they have a certain blood-alcohol level? Let’s break down drinking, driving and how such things are measured and punished.

First, the rules: In the United States, anything north of 0.08 percent is against the law. This has become the generally agreed-upon measurement, even if it isn’t entirely agreed-upon. (More on that in a moment.)

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that when a driver is at 0.02 percent, they are less able to keep an eye on moving objects and multitask; once the driver hits 0.05 percent, they have trouble steering and coordinating. At 0.08 percent, though, drivers have problems with perception, concentration and speed control. Even higher percentages make it harder for drivers to stay in one lane (0.1 percent) and maintain control of the vehicle (0.15 percent), according to the CDC.

Nearly one-third of all traffic deaths in 2012 involved drivers with a blood-alcohol reading of at least 0.08 percent, reports the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Safety Administration. More than half of the drivers involved in these fatal crashes measured at 0.15 percent or greater.  (More than 10,300 people were killed that year in these crashes. Just under two-thirds of the people killed were driving.)

The law of the land is that driving with a blood-alcohol level of at least 0.08 percent is a crime, though exactly how the crime is punished varies from state to state. (The Governors Highway Safety Association has a handy list here, outlining how the punishments vary in terms of length and what happens to the drivers.)

Arizona added the “super extreme DUI” charge in 2007 to cover anyone with a blood-alcohol level of at least .20 percent, which can carry with it a sentence of 45 days in prison. The “extreme DUI” category in Arizona, covering measurements of at least 0.15 but less than 0.20 percent, has a punishment of 30 days in prison.

At what level is a person’s driving actually impaired? This has been the subject of some debate. The National Transportation Safety Board recommended last year that the U.S. set 0.05 percent as the limit for legal driving, citing research showing that the risk goes up once a driver reaches the 0.05 percent mark. Lowering the legal limit “would lead to meaningful reductions in crashes, injuries, and fatalities,” the leading federal safety advocate said in a report.

This isn’t a new theory, either. An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association published in 1986 spoke of the “scientific consensus that alcohol causes deterioration of driving skills beginning at 0.05″ percent. The AMA recommended that all states adopt the 0.05 percent measurement for impaired driving.

But when the NTSB made its recommendation last year, there was some push-back. “This recommendation is ludicrous,” Sarah Longwell, managing director of the American Beverage Institute, a restaurant trade group, said in a statement at the time. “Moving from 0.08 to 0.05 would criminalize perfectly responsible behavior.” Meanwhile, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx didn’t express much enthusiasm for making a national push. More than a year later, the national standard remains 0.08 percent.

Mark Berman is a reporter on the National staff. He runs Post Nation, a destination for breaking news and developing stories from around the country.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
How to make Sean Brock's 'Heritage' cornbread
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
The signature dish of Charleston, S.C.
Play Videos
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
What you need to know about filming the police
Play Videos
The Post taste tests Pizza Hut's new hot dog pizza
5 tips for using your thermostat
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Natalie Jennings · July 29, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.