The Washington Post

Cantor opposes Senate deal


House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Va. leaves a Republican caucus meeting on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013. (AP/Jacquelyn Martin)

After a two-hour meeting in which House Republicans debated the "fiscal cliff" deal passed by the Senate, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) emerged and told reporters that he opposes the Senate's deal, likely killing chances for a fast House passage of the bill without changes.

Members said no decisions have been made about how to proceed. They were told leaders would discuss the input of rank-and-file members and gather the group again later Tuesday to discuss a plan to move forward.

They said Cantor and House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) mostly listened to members, who expressed grave doubts about the deal because it would raise taxes without cutting spending.

Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) said Cantor "forcefully" expressed his opposition during the closed door meeting. Boehner did not take a position, indicating he was not happy but wanted to listen to the views of the conference.

Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.) said he believed a "consensus" was developing that the GOP should amend the Senate's plan to attach additional spending cuts. "I would be shocked if the bill did not go back to the Senate," he said.

That move would ensure no resolution to the "fiscal cliff" crisis by the time financial markets open Wednesday. Members said some in the room cautioned colleagues they must accept the deal or risk damaging the economy and their own reputations. But, Bachus said, a prevailing view among others was that Congress must get a handle on government spending or "doom the markets."

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Boehner, said "the Speaker and Leader laid out options to the members and listened to feedback. The lack of spending cuts in the Senate bill was a universal concern amongst members in today’s meeting. Conversations with members will continue throughout the afternoon on the path forward.”

Rosalind Helderman is a political enterprise and investigations reporter for the Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
What happened in New Hampshire
Spending per vote
John Kasich is running one of the most cost-efficient campaigns, bested only by Donald Trump. Ben Carson, however, has spent a lot for a fourth-place finish in Iowa and eight-place finish in New Hampshire. Data is available through the end of December.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
What happened in N.H.
Most Read

politics

post-politics

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.