The Washington Post

McCain and Graham attack Rand Paul’s ‘ill-informed’ filibuster

Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) filibuster appears to have exposed a divide in the Republican Party, with the party's two top foreign policy hawks -- Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) -- taking to the floor Thursday to denounce Paul's effort in stark terms.

Immigration_image_1024w Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)

McCain and Graham said they support the president's right to use deadly force -- including drones -- against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil who are engaged in terrorism, when there aren't other options available.

Graham even labeled Paul's effort -- which was joined by more than a dozen Senate Republicans -- as "ill-informed."

"I don't worry about [drones killing Americans]," Graham said. "Here's what I worry about: that al-Qaeda has killed 2,958 of us and is going to add to the total if we let our guard down. And I will do everything in my power to protect this president -- who I disagree with a lot -- and future presidents in having an ill-informed Congress take over the legitimate authority under the Constitution and the laws of this land to be the Commander in Chief on behalf of all of us."

Graham appeared with a placard that compared the number of Americans killed on U.S. soil by al-Qaeda (2,958) to the number killed by drones (0).

"We need hearings," McCain said. "But that conversation should not be about drones killing Jane Fonda and people in cafes. It should be all about what authority and what checks and balances should exist…”

(Paul in his filibuster Wednesday suggested that the loose definition of who is an enemy of the state could mean the U.S. would drop "Hellfire missiles on Jane Fonda" or could kill people sitting down at cafes with people they didn't know were terrorists.)

McCain also linked from his Twitter account to a Wall Street Journal op-ed that was strongly critical of Paul's "rant."

Paul has admitted that he trusts that President Obama would not use such authority, but he said he worries that it might be abused by future presidents who aren't as scrupulous.

Here are McCain's remarks:

Aaron Blake covers national politics and writes regularly for The Fix.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
What happened in New Hampshire
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
What happened in N.H.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.