The Washington Post

Heritage: Cornyn amendment is a Trojan Horse

Heritage Action, the political arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation, came out Friday against Sen. John Cornyn's (R-Tex.) border security amendment, saying its passage would give false legitimacy to the Gang of Eight's immigration bill.

In a statement, Heritage Action CEO Michael Needham said it "will oppose amendments that, if adopted, will serve as political cover for those senators seeking to justify their support for amnesty.”

Senate conservatives have been pushing for the Cornyn amendment, which requires certain border security requirements to be satisfied before it would trigger a path to permanent legal status or citizenship.

The amendment has been cast as a way to satisfy Republican concerns about the bill and make it more passable in the GOP-controlled House. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) have both suggested the Cornyn amendment's passage may win their votes for the larger package, and Gang of Eight member Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) has also said he wants more border security in the final bill.

Democratic leaders, meanwhile, have suggested the Cornyn amendment is a "poison pill" that would lead Democrats to oppose the larger bill.

In response to Heritage's decision to come out against the measure, Cornyn's office noted that critics of the immigration package, including Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) voted for it in committee.

"Sen. Cornyn is pleased with the support he has received and looks forward to calling up his amendment," Cornyn spokesman Drew Brandewie said in a statement.

Heritage Action notes that immigrants are given temporary legal status before the border security conditions are met, which it says constitutes amnesty.

It will also score the vote as a key vote on its congressional scorecard, which rates members according to their conservatism.

Heritage, which is headed up by former senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), has staked out some very conservative territory in opposition to the immigration bill.

A Heritage Foundation study last month suggested that the bill could cost more than $6 trillion. But the study was widely panned by Republican supporters of comprehensive immigration, and one of its author's later resigned after it was revealed that he had written for a Web site with nationalistic leanings.

Updated at 4:12 p.m. to include comment from Cornyn's office.

Aaron Blake covers national politics and writes regularly for The Fix.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Don’t be ‘that’ sports parent | On Parenting
Miss Manners: The technology's changed, but the rules are the same
A flood of refugees from Syria but only a trickle to America
Play Videos
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
Kids share best advice from mom
Using Fitbit to help kids lose weight
Play Videos
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
Transgender swimmer now on Harvard men's team
Portland's most important meal of the day
Play Videos
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
How much can one woman eat?
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Aaron Blake · June 14, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.