The Washington Post

Senate moving on from Syria resolution — for now

The Senate is formally dropping consideration of a resolution authorizing U.S. military force in Syria and deferring instead to diplomatic attempts to end the crisis.

"We've agreed on a way forward based on the president's speech last night," Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) announced on the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon.

While Secretary of State John F. Kerry travels to Geneva on Thursday for talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Reid said the Senate would move on so as "not to tread water" on the Syrian issue and begin debating a bipartisan energy efficiency bill that has been waiting for consideration for months.

But talks on the wording of a new Syria resolution will continue among members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and other senior senators who are often involved in foreign affairs and military policy.

“We have a very broad cross-section of the senate – Democrats and Republicans – and this action is likely to create a stronger foundation for the use of support of force should it be necessary," said Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), who chairs the foreign relations panel.

The talks will continue in order "to keep in consonance in case there’s an effort to remove the chemical weapons from Bashar Assad," said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who added that the resolution likely would lay out potential timelines and conditions.

“I think we’ll know in a couple of days" whether we have to act, McCain said.

Several senators said they were hopeful that the Obama administration would be able to end the stalemate through diplomatic means.

"I’m very skeptical  of Putin’s credibility, Assad’s credibility and the UN’s ability to execute this kind of resolution. However, I do think that the president should be given the opportunity," said Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.). "If we could get Assad with verification to give up the chemical weapons, I don’t know who would be against that. It makes sense for the world."

Follow Ed O'Keefe on Twitter: @edatpost

Ed O’Keefe is covering the 2016 presidential campaign, with a focus on Jeb Bush and other Republican candidates. He's covered presidential and congressional politics since 2008. Off the trail, he's covered Capitol Hill, federal agencies and the federal workforce, and spent a brief time covering the war in Iraq.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Republicans debated Saturday night. The New Hampshire primary is Feb. 9. Get caught up on the race.
Highlights from Saturday's GOP debate
Except for an eminent domain attack from Bush, Trump largely avoided strikes from other candidates.

Christie went after Rubio for never having been a chief executive and for relying on talking points.

Carson tried to answer a question on Obamacare by lamenting that he hadn't been asked an earlier question about North Korea.
The GOP debate in 3 minutes
Listen
Play Video
Quoted
We have all donors in the audience. And the reason they're booing me? I don't want their money!
Donald Trump, after the debate crowd at St. Anselm's College booed him for telling Jeb Bush to be "quiet."
Listen
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She's planning to head Sunday to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 38%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.