The Washington Post

Abortion-rights groups challenge controversial Texas law in federal court Friday

Lenell Ripley, second from left, cries as she demonstrates with other abortion rights supporters outside the Capitol auditorium in Austin, Texas, Thursday July 18, 2013. Opponents are now challenging the state's sweeping abortion restrictions, which could shutter most of the clinics in the nation's second-most populous state. (AP Photo/Austin American-Statesman, Jay Janner) Lenell Ripley, second from left, cries as she demonstrates with other abortion-rights supporters outside the Capitol auditorium in Austin, July 18, 2013. Opponents are now challenging the state's sweeping abortion restrictions, which could shutter most of the clinics in the nation's second-most populous state. (Jay Janner/AP Photo/Austin American-Statesman)

More than a dozen abortion providers filed a lawsuit Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas challenging two key aspects of a controversial Texas antiabortion law, which limits access to both surgical and medication abortions in the state.

The lawsuit seeks to strike down new requirements that abortion doctors must have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their clinic and that all abortions must take place in surgical centers, rather than allowing women take abortion medication at home, on the grounds that these restrictions impose an unconstitutional burden on a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy.

"If the medication abortion restrictions and admitting privileges requirement are allowed to take effect on October 29, more than one-third of the state’s licensed abortion facilities will be forced to stop offering abortions altogether, eliminating services entirely in Fort Worth, Harlingen, Killeen, Lubbock, McAllen, and Waco," the complaint states. "Other facilities will be forced to decrease the number of abortions they provide."

Noting that "at least 1 in 12 women will have to travel more than 100 miles to obtain abortion care" if the law goes into effect, the complaint adds, "These requirements, individually and taken together, violate the constitutional rights guaranteed to both Plaintiffs and their patients by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution."

The challenge -- lodged on behalf of 10 abortion clinics and three of their doctors -- was jointly filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Texas, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the Texas-based law firm George Brothers Kincaid & Horton.

The lawsuit does not challenge another provision in the law banning abortions after 20 weeks, which enjoys broader public support than other abortion restrictions. That restriction is currently under litigation in federal court in Arizona and state court in Georgia.

"We are challenging the things that have the most drastic effect, the quickest," said Jennifer Dalven, who directs the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, in an interview, adding that the admitting privileges requirement alone could close a third of Texas' 36 abortion clinics.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion political action committee Susan B. Anthony List, accused Planned Parenthood and its allies as "seeking to undo health and safety standards aimed at protecting women."

Elizabeth Graham, executive director of Texas Right to Life, said the fact that the groups are not challenging the 20-week ban shows "the abortion industry is signaling some major losses when House Bill 2 is properly implemented."

Dalven said advocates may challenge another provision of the Texas law, requiring clinics to undertake costly building upgrades to put them in compliance with other ambulatory surgical clinics, but those regulations will not take effect until September 2014 and have not been finalized.

"This isn’t the end of the story," she said.

The fight over Texas's abortion law garnered widespread attention this summer, when state Sen. Wendy Davis (D) waged a lengthy filibuster that temporarily blocked the bill's passage. Davis ultimately failed from keeping the proposal from becoming law, but she has capitalized on the publicity surrounding that fight to lay the groundwork for a gubernatorial bid in Texas, which she plans to formally launch Oct. 3.

Abortion opponents are gaining ground across the country, passing a slew of measures imposing new requirements on abortion providers and banning the procedure earlier on in a woman's pregnancy.

"Politicians are interfering with the personal medical decisions of women who already have the least access to birth control and preventive health care," said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement.

Texas attorney general Greg Abbott, who is named in the lawsuit, could not be reached immediately for comment Friday morning.

Juliet Eilperin is The Washington Post's White House bureau chief, covering domestic and foreign policy as well as the culture of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. She is the author of two books—one on sharks, and another on Congress, not to be confused with each other—and has worked for the Post since 1998.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.