The Washington Post

FEC deadlocks, for now, on whether political committees can accept bitcoin

Political donors, put away those bitcoin wallets for now.

The Federal Election Commission on Thursday deadlocked on the question of whether federal candidates and political action committees can accept the virtual currency, with the three Democratic appointees saying they want the agency to take more time to study the issue and develop a formal policy to govern the use of bitcoins in campaigns.

Chair Ellen Weintraub stressed that the lack of action did not mean the panel would not approve bitcoin donations at some point, but said that the Internet cash raised many complicated questions – particularly about disclosure and whether bitcoins constitute money – that required more examination.

“We have not seen the last of bitcoin at the FEC,” she said.

Created by a still-unknown developer in 2009, the Bitcoin network allows people to make nearly instantaneous online payments without going through a bank or a third party. The transactions are public, although the parties involved are identified only by their bitcoin addresses.

Senate committee hearings held this week exploring the banking and law enforcement implications of virtual currencies such as bitcoin appeared to have given the Democratic commissioners pause.

“I’d feel more comfortable if we took this a little more slowly,” said Commissioner Ann Ravel.

The three Republicans on the panel were in favor of issuing an advisory opinion Thursday that would have allowed candidates and PACs to accept the electronic currency in the same way they handle donations of stock.

“I think we’ve been a little bit distracted by the novelty of bitcoins,” said Vice Chairman Lee Goodman. “Although they represent a unique and new type of asset, they are an asset.”

“I think the legal question for the FEC is quite vanilla,” he added.

Matea Gold is a national political reporter for The Washington Post, covering money and influence.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.