The Washington Post

Supreme Court won’t look at reinstating Arizona’s 20-week abortion ban

The Supreme Court  opted Monday not to review Arizona's struck-down abortion restrictions — a decision that could have a bearing on a plethora of new abortion restrictions across the country.

From Robert Barnes:

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive Arizona’s new restrictions on abortion, turning away a request that the justices review an appeals court ruling that had struck down a ban on most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

The Supreme Court, as is its custom, gave no reason for declining to take the case.

Arizona’s ban is the first to reach the high court from a batch of state laws passed around the country that restrict abortion after 20 weeks, which is before a fetus is considered to be viable outside the womb. That has been the standard the Supreme Court set for when government may disallow abortion.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) signed the ban into law in April 2012, and nine other states have similar bans.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said last year such bans violate the standards set by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade.

Republicans in Congress and in many states around the country are passing new abortion restrictions, including a 20-week abortion ban that passed in the GOP-controlled House last year.

One particularly prominent case that is working its way through the courts is Texas's new abortion restrictions, some of which were ruled unconstitutional by a district judge last year. A federal appeals court heard the state's appeal of that ruling last week.

Aaron Blake covers national politics and writes regularly for The Fix.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.