The Washington Post

Senators rally around Feinstein, demand answers from CIA

[posttv url="" ]


Senators of both parties voiced support Tuesday for Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) decision to publicly accuse the CIA of violating federal law and interfering with a committee investigation into the agency's interrogation practices, while some Republicans on the panel suggested that Democrats might also be at fault.

Just hours after the speech, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) suggested that "If what they're saying is true about the CIA, this is Richard Nixon stuff." He said he didn't know the details of the investigation and expected to be briefed soon. "The legislative branch should declare war on the CIA -- if it's true,"  he added.

But the two most-senior Republicans on the Intelligence Committee, Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and Richard Burr (R-N.C.), declined to discuss the specifics of Feinstein's allegations. Chambliss rushed away from reporters after a midday vote.

Burr, a longtime member of both the House and Senate intelligence panels, said he hadn't yet read Feinstein's remarks but said he personally opposes openly discussing activities of the panel or the CIA.

[posttv url="" ]


"I personally don’t believe that anything that goes on in the intelligence committee should ever be discussed publicly," he told reporters. "Certainly classified information, it’s breaking the law to discuss that. If I had my way, with the exception of nominees, there would never be a public intelligence hearing."

With Chambliss retiring after this year, Burr is next in line to serve as the top Republican on the panel or as its chairman, if the GOP retakes control of the Senate in November.

When pressed again to respond, Burr stood firm, saying that while not all agency activities are classified, "many of them are classified, and I believe that when [White House press secretary] Jay Carney gets up and talks about drone strikes, he has in fact talked about classified, covert operations and ought to be removed."

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a more junior member of the committee, said in an interview with Bloomberg TV that that situation "is a bit more complicated than what's being put out there by Senator Feinstein or others." Rubio called for an "impartial investigation" of the situation.

"I think until that point people should reserve judgment," he added. "But I would just caution that I don't think anyone has a clean hand and I think it's important for the full truth to come out.  I think people may be surprised to learn that, in this case, there were no good guys and maybe two or three bad ones."

Other Republicans with less direct knowledge of the situation expressed concerns and initial support for Feinstein. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a senior member of the Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees, called her allegations "very disturbing," adding: "We may need some kind of independent investigation." But McCain stressed that it is too soon to know whether federal law was broken. If the allegations are true, McCain said, there should be repercussions for the CIA and its director, John Brennan.

But in an interview Tuesday morning with NBC's Andrea Mitchell, Brennan denied Feinstein's allegations, saying "nothing could be further from the truth." He added that if he's done anything wrong, it will be President Obama to ask for his resignation.

Democrats, including some on the committee who frequently raise concerns with intelligence matters, praised Feinstein for speaking out. During their weekly caucus luncheon, she received two standing ovations. First, when Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) mentioned her speech and again when she urged her colleagues to read her remarks, according to a senior aide familiar with the meeting but not authorized to speak publicly about it.

Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), the chamber's longest-serving Democrat, told reporters that "in 40 years here, it was one of the best speeches I’d ever heard and one of the most important."

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said that her speech "goes precisely to the question of whether the Congress can do effective oversight over the modern intelligence apparatus." He noted that at the recent annual public hearing on worldwide threats, he asked whether federal laws barring snooping on computers applied to the CIA. He said that the agency has replied in writing that such laws do apply to agency officials.

Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.), another outspoken member of the panel, said Feinstein's concerns bolster his own attempts to get answers about the CIA's interrogation program. "Unfortunately, the CIA responded by trying to hide the truth from the American people about this program and undermine the Senate Intelligence Committee's oversight role by illegally searching committee computers," he said in a statement. "The U.S. Constitution is clear and Coloradans agree: The separation of powers and aggressive oversight are fundamental to our democracy, and Coloradans can count on me to continue to protect these foundational pillars no matter who is in the White House."

And Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) also praised Feinstein's decision to go public. "I know she has tried to address this discretely through a constructive dialogue with the administration, but a steady stream of inaccurate and off-the-record anonymous leaks to the press have made that effort impossible," he said in a statement.

[posttv url="posttv url="" ]


Wesley Lowery is a national reporter covering law enforcement and justice for the Washington Post. He previously covered Congress and national politics.
Ed O’Keefe is covering the 2016 presidential campaign, with a focus on Jeb Bush and other Republican candidates. He's covered presidential and congressional politics since 2008. Off the trail, he's covered Capitol Hill, federal agencies and the federal workforce, and spent a brief time covering the war in Iraq.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
We'll have half a million voters in South Carolina. I can shake a lot of hands, but I can't shake that many.
Sen. Marco Rubio, speaking to a group of reporters about his strategy to regain support after a poor performance in the last debate
Fact Checker
Sanders’s claim that Clinton objected to meeting with ‘our enemies’
Sanders said that Clinton was critical of Obama in 2008 for suggesting meeting with Iran. In fact, Clinton and Obama differed over whether to set preconditions, not about meeting with enemies. Once in office, Obama followed the course suggested by Clinton, abandoning an earlier position as unrealistic.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.