The Washington Post

Cheney: Isolationists are ‘out to lunch’ (he’s not, not talking about Rand Paul)

Former vice president Dick Cheney and his daughter said Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) foreign policy views would make it difficult to support him as a presidential candidate. (Jackie Kucinich/The Washington Post)


Former Vice President Dick Cheney says isolationists are “out to lunch” and indicated it would be difficult to support a Republican presidential candidate who held those views in 2016.

The comment, made in an interview with Politico on Monday, came after the former vice president was asked whether Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) would be “dangerous as president.”

Cheney declined to attack Paul by name, but said the policy of “isolationism is crazy” and warned against the strain that is forming within Republican Party.

“Anybody who went through 9/11, who thinks we can retreat behind our oceans and be safe and secure is, I’m sorry, you’re out to lunch,” he said.

Answering a separate question, Liz Cheney, Cheney’s daughter and a former Senate candidate in Wyoming, took aim at Paul when asked whether she preferred the Kentucky senator or Texas Gov. Rick Perry as a potential 2016 nominee.

“Obviously, Senator Paul leaves something to be desired in respect to national security policy,” she said. “When you look at, without endorsing anybody, I think that I’ve got some big concerns about the extent to which Senator Paul seems to think we can be safe if we just come home and try to build a fortress America, that’s certainly not going to work.”

Perry and Paul have spent the last few days feuding on the editorial pages over the issue of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.

It’s not the first time  the Cheneys have publically criticized Paul’s foreign policy.

In an interview with “Meet the Press” last month, Paul said the recent turmoil in Iraq and the Middle East was at least, in part, caused by U.S. involvement in the region.

“I think the same questions could be asked of those who supported the Iraq War. You know, were they right in their predictions? Were there weapons of mass destruction there” That’s what the war was sold on,” he said. “Was the war won in 2005, when many of these people said it was won? They didn’t really, I think, understand the civil war that would break out.”

Cheney fired back, slamming Paul as “basically an isolationist.” “He doesn't believe we ought to be involved in that part of the world. I think it's absolutely essential," Cheney said on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos."

Paul has repeatedly rejected the “isolationist” moniker, describing himself as “ a realist, not a neoconservative, nor an isolationist,” in a speech to the Heritage Foundation last year.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
How to make Sean Brock's 'Heritage' cornbread
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
The signature dish of Charleston, S.C.
Play Videos
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
What you need to know about filming the police
Play Videos
The Post taste tests Pizza Hut's new hot dog pizza
5 tips for using your thermostat
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Sean Sullivan · July 14, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.