The Washington Post

House GOP revises border plan, set to cut $500 million from framework due to conservative concerns


House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio)  (Evan Vucci/AP)

House Republicans are modifying their plan to address the record number of migrants the U.S.-Mexico border, with a framework to spend less than $1 billion gaining traction Friday.

"It's quite possible," said Rep. Kay Granger (Tex.), who  led a GOP working group on the border, when asked whether the cost of the package would be below $1 billion.

As they left a House Republican conference meeting, senior House GOP aides concurred, citing concerns from conservatives over the size and scope of legislation.

This latest development underscores the challenge facing House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) as he works to find consensus on a border plan before the House adjourns Aug. 1 for a five-week recess, and comes after House GOP leaders unveiled a $1.5 proposal Wednesday, far less than President Obama's $3.7 billion request.

But by lowering the cost and concentrating the bill on more quickly processing the young children and families who have illegally entered the country, boosting funding for Border Patrol and tweaking a 2008 anti-trafficking law to make it easier to deport minors from Central America, House leaders hope to be in a position next week to win passage.

Republicans are down to "bare bones suggestions," Granger said.

Some House Republicans, however, remain unsure of whether the leadership will be able to win a majority of Republican support, in spite of Boehner's willingness to adjust his initial outline. Few also believe that House Republicans will be able to reach agreement with Senate Democrats on a final deal in the coming days.

Addressing President Obama's "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals" policy, which enables some young migrants to not immediately be deported, is also likely to not be part of the House GOP's plan and another reason some conservatives may oppose it.

"We've got to call on the president to cease those activities," said Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), a longtime critic of bipartisan efforts to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

"John is going to lose 60 Republicans no matter what he does," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a Boehner ally. "Sixty Republicans are ready to vote against anything, so he may have to find some Democrats to vote with him."

But by paring down the plan, Boehner appears, for the moment, to have calmed his ranks, particularly to his right, and looks poised to get most Republicans to back him on the floor. Over the weekend, members will receive updates on the final version of the plan, aides said.

"It looks good," said Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), an influential House conservative, as he left the GOP meeting. Added Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), the incoming House majority whip: "The vast majority of our members want to solve this, do it in a targeted way that actually addresses the problem."

"It's all about getting to 218 votes," said tea party favorite Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho), referencing the number of votes a bill needs to pass the lower chamber. "What we're hearing is good."

Senate Democrats are working on their own proposal, which would spend $2.7 billion to provide more resources at the southern border. Unlike the House proposal, that plan would not seek changes to the 2008 anti-trafficking law. Progressive activists oppose changes, but a handful of centrist Democrats, such Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), are open to discussing adjustments to the law.

Robert Costa is a national political reporter at The Washington Post.
Paul Kane covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
Quoted
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

post-politics

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.