Late Wednesday, a bipartisan group in the House of Representatives introduced a legislative fix to the carbon-capture tax credit that has attracted 24 Republicans and 9 Democratic co-sponsors in addition to the lead sponsor, Rep. K. Michael Conaway (R-Tex.).
“In today’s hyperpartisan environment, finding a piece of legislation that enjoys this amount of widespread support is rare,” Conaway said. “That makes this legislation a no-brainer as far as I’m concerned.”
Sequestering carbon dioxide has much (but not total) across-the-aisle appeal because not only can the captured carbon dioxide reduce the impact humans are having on warming the planet, but that gas can be useful to the oil industry to push out pockets of oil underground in a process called “enhanced oil recovery.”
“We think that with this kind of bipartisan support in both chambers,” said Brad Crabtree, vice president of the Great Plains Institute, an advocacy group, “there’s no reason we can’t get this done this year.”
Under current law, carbon emitters get a $20 tax credit for each metric ton of carbon dioxide stored underground and $10 for each metric ton used in enhanced oil recovery.
But the carbon-capture lobby says that those tax credits are not high enough to spark private investment. Conaway's bill raises that tax credit to $35 per ton across-the-board.
Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) introduced a similar bill in July that an ideologically diverse group of 23 other senators signed onto. They include some of the chamber's biggest climate advocates, like Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Al Franken (D-Minn.), and others who pushed for the United States to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement, like John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Roy Blunt (R-Mo.).
But such a tax credit loses support toward the edges of the political spectrum. Some fiscal conservatives despise special tax breaks for any specific industry. And some environmentalists dislike any measure meant to prop up the use of a fossil fuel like coal, which has other environmental impacts besides carbon emissions.
"While this effort to find cleaner energy sources is noteworthy, carbon capture and storage technology for coal plants can't compete with America's plentiful clean energy resources, said John Coequyt, the Sierra Club's global climate policy director, adding that "coal mining and the waste created by CCS projects are too harmful to communities."
On Tuesday, Heitkamp was one of three red-state Senate Democrats invited to a White House dinner as Trump tries to woo enough support across the aisle to pass a comprehensive tax overhaul. And the president is certainly open to dealing with Democrats lately -- apparently striking some kind of deal with leaders Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) last night to fix DACA while pumping up border security (no wall necessary, say some versions of the story). That follows a deal on fiscal matters and hurricane relief with "Chuck and Nancy" earlier this month, infuriating Republicans.
During that dinner, Heitkamp pressed for her carbon capture tax credit to be included in a tax package, her office said. ( Read more on where a tax overhaul stands from my colleague, Tory Newmyer).
This month, Trump went to North Dakota to kick off his tax reform effort, where he praised Heitkamp even as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) eyes unseating her in 2018.
“We need support, so thank you, Senator. Senator Heitkamp,” Trump ad-libbed from the podium after asking Heitkamp to join him on stage. “Everyone’s saying: What’s she doing up here? But I’ll tell you what: Good woman, and I think we’ll have your support. I hope we’ll have your support. And thank you very much, Senator.”
Heitkamp also told Schumer, who dined with Trump on Wednesday evening, that a carbon-capture tax credit fix needed to be part of the discussion when it comes to must-pass legislation.
Democrats are also pushing for an extension of tax credits for advanced nuclear energy and “orphaned” energy technologies mistakenly left out of an end-of-year tax-and-spending bill in 2015. Those technologies include small wind power, combined heat and power, geothermal pumps and fuel cells.
With all the bipartisanship going around, this is potentially another area of agreement.
|You are reading The Energy 202, our must-read tipsheet on energy and the environment.|
|Not a regular subscriber?|
-- In like Flynn: Democratic lawmakers are looking into whether retired Gen. Michael Flynn lobbied on behalf of a project to sell dozens of nuclear reactors across the Middle East at same time that he served as President Trump’s national security adviser.
Reps. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, and Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), the senior Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, wrote a letter that was sent on Tuesday to Flynn’s lawyer and executives of firms that worked on the nuclear project, which attempt to sell reactors in Israel, Egypt and other countries in the region.
“The American people deserve to know whether General Flynn was secretly promoting the private interests of these businesses while he was a campaign adviser, transition official, or President Trump’s national security adviser,” Cummings and Engel write in the letter. “For these reasons, we now request all communications that you and other officials at your companies had with General Flynn or other Trump Administration officials during the presidential campaign, during the transition, during General Flynn’s tenure as national security adviser, or after General Flynn’s departure from the White House.”
This is exactly the sort of thing Trump's lawyers worried about: a potential scandal born from the extra scrutiny paid to those embroiled in the broader Russia investigation that don't appear to have anything to do with Russia.
Also, why might Middle Eastern countries want nuclear power? After all, so many of them, including Egypt, have signification oil reserves.
The answer: Diversification from one energy source whose price can widely fluctuate. For example, the United Arab Emirates, a large oil exporter, is building nuclear reactors with the aim of producing 8 percent of its power from nuclear by 2050 (with another 44 percent expected to come from renewables by that year too).
-- Going in for the kill: House lawmakers voted Wednesday to pass an amendment to its 2018 spending bill that would block the Environmental Protection Agency from implementing an Obama-era methane rule. The House voted to pass the measure 218-195 to block funding for the rule that would limit methane emissions from oil and gas drilling sites, according to the Washington Examiner.
Why is the House using precious floor time to do this? Because EPA chief Scott Pruitt is having trouble getting it done himself. The EPA had previously proposed a two-year delay on implementation of the rule, though a federal appeals court ruled in July that the agency could not do so.
-- This could have been a big storm in FEMA: President Trump’s nominee for the No. 2 spot at the Federal Emergency Management Agency has withdrawn from consideration, NBC News reported, after the network flagged a federal investigation about falsified records.
The investigation revealed that Daniel A. Craig had falsified government travel and timekeeping records during his post under President George W. Bush in 2005. The FBI and Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General found “insufficient evidence that Craig had violated conflict-of-interest laws in the awarding of huge FEMA contracts in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, according to a 2011 report that has never been made public but which was reviewed by NBC News.”
“Given the distraction this will cause the Agency in a time when they cannot afford to lose focus, I have withdrawn from my nomination,” Craig told NBC News in an emailed statement. Craig told NBC News that he disclosed the investigation to the White House and Senate, which would have voted on his nomination.
Why'd this happen? An inspector general report should have easily come up in Craig's vetting process, if it occurred. And Trump had the wherewithal to choose William “Brock” Long as FEMA administrator, a veteran of government disaster response from Alabama viewed both before and after Hurricanes Harvey and Irma as a competent pick. His uncontroversial nomination passed the Senate in a 94-5 vote.
--While on the subject of FEMA, officials from the agency estimate that a quarter of homes in the Florida Keys have been totaled following Hurricane Irma. Emergency relief workers began on Tuesday searching for any Irma victims, the Associated Press reported. “It’s going to be pretty hard for those coming home,” Plantation Key resident Petrona Hernandez told the AP. “It’s going to be devastating to them.”
-- "A longer discussion another day": White House budget director Mick Mulvaney attempted to dodge a question from CNN’s Jake Tapper on Wednesday evening about whether he thought fighting climate change was a “waste of taxpayer money” in the aftermath of two major hurricanes.
“NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association has concluded that climate change is happening, that human activity is contributing to it and that the warming of the planet and ocean temperatures creates conditions that allow for storms to get bigger and stronger and more intense,” Tapper explained. “Given all that, and given the havoc that we’ve seen, why is fighting it or trying to learn more about it a waste of money?”
Mulvaney responded that he would be “happy to have a longer discussion another day about climate change, man-made climate change" but he hopes to focus for now on the hurricane victims.
“Keep in mind what we’re focusing on right now is taking care of the folks who survived this disaster, the folks who need our immediate help,” Mulvaney said. “There’s plenty of time later on to have those discussions and I know that we will because climate change clearly is a big topic for the media but we continue to focus our attention on the folks who need us right now.”
“Alright, well it’s a big topic for the world but I do want to move on,” Tapper responded.
This sounds familiar: Two weeks ago in an interview on CNN, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway chided Chris Cuomo for focusing on climate change in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Harvey.
“Chris we’re trying to help the people whose lives are literally underwater and you want to have a conversation about climate change,” Conway said. “Sure I’ll come back and talk about that, right now I know that many Houstonians and those living in and around that city are either uninsured or underinsured, they’re facing a lack of housing, they’re exhausted they’re frustrated.... So we’re going to look at the human factor for quite a while now.”
Miami’s Republican Mayor Tomás Regalado isn't having any of this "insensitive" talk. He criticized EPA head Pruitt for saying it was “misplaced” and “very, very insensitive” to discuss climate change as a potential cause for hurricanes. He said on CNN of Pruitt: "It is insensitive on his part, because I wish that he would have been here when people ran from high rises, because of the storm surge. I wish that he would have been here when we were told that we were facing apocalyptic moments with a Cat 5 hurricane. And yet we got Cat 1 but the destruction here in Miami has been incredible for that kind of storm.”
-- R.I.P.: Pete V. Domenici, a Republican congressman from New Mexico who was a leading voice on budget and energy policy died Wednesday at the age of 85.
Domenici represented New Mexico in Congress from 1973 to 2009 -- the longest serving senator in the state’s history. He was known, writes Elaine S. Povich for The Post, for being a champion of the Energy Department's national labs system and nuclear energy as chair of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
Energy Secretary Rick Perry offered his condolences:
As did Frank Klotz, head of the National Nuclear Security Administration:
--And now we wait: Five years after Hurricane Sandy, The Washington Post’s Philip Bump reflects on the recovery of Patterson Avenue on Staten Island. “Water was eight, 10, 12 feet deep, depending on where you were. The houses were often not much taller than that in a beach community made up of a number of small bungalows. Days later, the water had fully receded, leaving behind destroyed homes, flooded basements and human bodies,” he writes. And still, the street bears the open wounds of that devastation.
Now, residents of the area are warning victims of the latest major hurricanes to “be patient.” “There’s going to be a lot of red tape going through FEMA,” 80-year-old Kathryn Colt told Bump. “We went through a lot of hell with that.”
-- But what about the deer? Returning home to assess the damage from Irma, Florida Keys residents are also worried about the fate of the endangered population of tiny Key deer. The deer are about as big as dogs, and they have droves of loyal fans.
The Post’s Karin Brullliard explains the history of the species:
After poaching and habitat loss led to their near extinction in the 1950s, a federal recovery effort helped the deer population rebound to somewhere between 700 and 1,000. It hasn't always been easy: In the past year, they've battled a nasty flesh-eating screwworm that eventually killed 135 members of the fragile herd. Vehicles killed about the same number in 2016.
"People can't help but fall in love with the Key deer," Dan Clark, who manages the 8,500-acre National Key Deer Refuge and other wildlife refuges in the Keys, told Brulliard. "I think there are people in the Florida Keys who care about them more than they care about their own pets and family members."
The reaction on social media from people wondering about the species post-Irma proves just that:
-- Oh right, there's another hurricane: Hurricane Jose, which brushed past the Leeward Islands just as Irma was crashing into Florida, is still lingering in the Atlantic. And Capital Weather Gang’s Angela Fritz reports its path is “extremely uncertain."
But she adds: "At this point, we’re willing to say that it’s unlikely to impact the U.S. coast. But a few model runs are still hinting at the idea that Jose could begin to drift north and west sometime next week."
-- Save the parasites — no, really: A warming planet may be contributing to the extinction of parasites around the world, with a new study finding that one in three may face extinction in the next century. A depletion of parasites in the environment could affect the world’s ecosystems, reports Carl Zimmer New York Times, and cause potential harm to human health.
As Zimmer, who writes frequently about parasites, reports:
Parasites typically live in or on their hosts, but that does not protect them from climate change. Rising air temperatures can harm them. Ticks, for instance, risk baking in the heat as they wait in the grass for their next victim. Hookworm larvae require damp soil to survive before slipping into someone’s foot.
And parasites need their hosts — if they go extinct, their parasites probably will, too.
Why should humans worry? Well, consider the deer tick:
Deer ticks, for example, spread Lyme disease, and climate change models suggest they have a rosy future as they expand northward... Migrating parasites like these will arrive in ecosystems where other parasitic species are disappearing. With less competition, they may be able to wreak more havoc — and not just on animal hosts. Many human diseases are the result of parasites and pathogens jumping from animal species to our own.
--The Big (Green) Apple: New York City mayor Bill de Blasio (D) will announce today a first-of-its-kind plan to force thousands of buildings to meet new energy efficiency standards, as he pushes to make New York City "a national leader in reducing greenhouse-gas emissions,” write The Post’s Brady Dennis and Kayla Epstein.
Existing buildings larger than 25,000 square feet would need to have more efficient heating and cooling systems, insulation and water heaters — that would apply to about 14,5000 private and city buildings that would need to meet the new efficiency targets by 2030 or face penalties. The mayor’s office says that would account for about a quarter of the city’s current emissions.
After 2030, de Blasio will propose annual penalties that are higher for larger buildings that use more fossil fuels. Penalties would also include blocking buildings from receiving permits for renovations.
The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions will hold an event on innovations in carbon capture and use.
The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources will hold a business meeting to consider various nominations.
FEMA surveys Florida Keys after Hurricane Irma destruction:
Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) find something they can agree on: Music.
Watch Jimmy Kimmel's interview with former White House press secretary Sean Spicer:
Here are four takeaways from Kimmel's interview with Spicer: