with Bastien Inzaurralde
Next up for the Trump administration: potentially labeling China a currency manipulator. The Treasury Department is considering the move in a report set for release next week, Bloomberg News’s Saleha Mohsin reports. “Declaring China to be a currency manipulator wouldn’t trigger any sanctions or other U.S. penalties, but it would escalate trade tensions, would likely upset markets and could pave the way for other actions down the road,” Mohsin writes. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has authority to apply the label, a step the United States hasn’t taken since 1994, and he tells the Financial Times that the department is monitoring the issue “very carefully”.
President Trump campaigned on the threat, accusing Beijing of holding down the value of the yuan to boost its exports. But he reversed himself upon taking office. The currency’s recent performance — it has dropped 9 percent against the dollar in the past six months and this week has drawn close to its lowest level since January 2017 — has stoked speculation on the Trump team that the Chinese are deliberately depressing its value. And there are signs the Chinese could tolerate it weakening further.
“As we look at trade issues there is no question that we want to make sure China is not doing competitive devaluations,” Mnuchin tells the FT, adding, “We are going to absolutely want to make sure that as part of any trade understanding we come to that currency has to be part of that.” He declined to discuss Treasury's forthcoming report.
Meanwhile, the president on Tuesday repeated his threat to apply tariffs to the remaining $267 billion in Chinese imports, roughly doubling the value of incoming goods subject to duties. “China wants to make a deal, and I say they’re not ready yet,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “I just say they’re not ready yet. And we’ve canceled a couple of meetings because I say they’re not ready to make a deal.” Trade watchers say an announcement to level the remaining tariffs could come any time, and the consensus leans toward the administration taking action before the end of the year.
For its part, China, which is taxing all American imports, is checking its own economic armory for new weapons to deploy. There are no indications the Chinese are planning anything imminently. But the New York Times’s Andrew Ross Sorkin on Tuesday raised the specter of Beijing invoking its “nuclear option” by dumping its sizable holdings of U.S. debt.
“The very idea is typically dismissed as a waste of time to even consider, and the reason is a sort of mutually assured destruction,” Sorkin writes. “But the conventional wisdom about what China might — or might not — be prepared to do could be wrong. China has lately reduced its holdings of United States government debt, and a growing number of financiers, economists and geopolitical analysts are quietly raising the prospect that China may look to its ability to influence interest rates as its ultimate Trump card.”
Brad Setser, a Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow, raised doubt that any such move is in the offing:
2) That's very different than an intentional Chinese effort to disrupt the Treasury market by shifting the composition of its US portfolio, whether by selling Treasury duration and buying bills, or moving out of the dollar and into euros/ yen pic.twitter.com/URUPrYbhTo— Brad Setser (@Brad_Setser) October 9, 2018
Beijing could also apply new scrutiny to big U.S. deals that need its regulatory approval. Disney’s tie-up with 21st Century Fox, which faces an October 19 deadline, needs Beijing’s sign-off, the NYT’s Alexandra Stevenson noted over the weekend. And so does United Technologies’s bid to acquire aerospace parts maker Rockwell Collins. “China’s antitrust regulators disclose little about their deliberations,” Stevenson wrote. “But some companies worry that this opacity could provide cover for retaliation in response to tariffs that the United States has placed on Chinese goods — and wonder if long-negotiated deals could become collateral damage in the trade war.”
With the picture darkening between the two nations — and the specter of a U.S.-led trade war dragging on projections for global growth — the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the OECD are making a joint call for a return to trade liberalization, Bloomberg's Shawn Donnan reports. Ahead of this week's meeting of global finance chiefs in Bali, IMF president Christine Lagarde pointed to the renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement as a potential model. “Let us try to use that momentum to turn tension into rapprochement,” she said on Wednesday.
|You are reading The Finance 202, our must-read tipsheet on where Wall Street meets Washington.|
|Not a regular subscriber?|
Keeping up with the news in President Trump’s Washington is exhausting — whether you live here, work in the nation’s capital, or are just watching from afar. That’s why next Tuesday, we’re launching Power Up by Jacqueline Alemany. It's a new newsletter from The Washington Post that will land in your inbox before you reach for that first cup of coffee. It will bring you Washington, fast.
Click here to sign up.
DINA POWELL'S RETURN?
— Powell tops Trump's shortlist for UN ambassador. Politico's Ben White: "Dina Powell, the Goldman Sachs executive and former senior White House official, is the top candidate to replace outgoing U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, two people familiar with the matter said Tuesday. Powell, who returned to Goldman in a senior role after leaving her job as President Donald Trump’s deputy national security adviser, is said to be strongly considering the job but also weighing family concerns. Powell already lives in New York, where the U.N. is based, but has young children and left the administration in part to spend more time with family. She is also said to be happy in her job at Goldman."
NYT's Maggie Haberman says Trump has been looking to bring Powell back:
Something to bear in mind re Haley replacement - when Dina Powell left the White House, Trump almost immediately started asking aides whether he should rehire her for something else.— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) October 9, 2018
Bloomberg's Max Abelson notes that Powell has beat a track back and forth between Republican administrations to Goldman Sachs:
Dina Powell's career: From George W. Bush's White House, to Goldman Sachs, to Trump's White House, back to Goldman Sachs, then...https://t.co/Q37TpZxaih— Max Abelson (@maxabelson) October 9, 2018
Breitbart, meanwhile, is highlighting what it calls "eight significant ties" between Powell and the Clintons, which include working with the Clinton Global Initiative when she headed Goldman's philanthropic arm.
Here was Trump praising Haley after she announced her resignation Tuesday:
— U.S. businesses worry about Trump's trade policies. The New York Times's Alan Rappeport: “Nafta, the North American Free Trade Agreement, could soon be on its way to becoming the U.S.M.C.A., but American businesses still face a cloud of trade uncertainty. The biggest concern: Lingering tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum that do not appear to be ending anytime soon. The metal tariffs, combined with retaliatory taxes that foreign governments have placed on American products, are undercutting the concessions that Mr. Trump won in the deal.
"While the new trade pact gives American farmers greater access to Canada’s dairy market and requires that a higher percentage of a car be produced in the United States, business and trade groups are raising questions about whether the agreement will actually deliver the economic boost the president promises . . . Among the sectors hardest hit by Mr. Trump’s approach are the beverage and auto industries, which rely heavily on foreign aluminum and steel to make cans and cars . . . The beer industry is feeling a similar pinch and called the new trade deal a ‘missed opportunity.’ ”
— E.U. could start talks over U.S. beef. Reuters's Philip Blenkinsop: “European Union countries are on the verge of agreeing to start negotiations with the United States to allow more U.S. beef into Europe, in what could be a major move to defuse transatlantic trade tensions. . . . The beef issue is officially separate from a pact reached by [Trump] and European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker in July to try and ease trade tensions. Trump has pledged to reduce the United States’ $151 billion goods trade deficit with the European Union. However, a deal to increase U.S. meat imports would affect the trade balance, as well as placating the Trump base of U.S. farmers and rural communities which have been hit by the tit-for-tat trade war with China.”
Mexico’s incoming president wants to rename the new NAFTA. He asked Twitter for help. (Josh Partlow)
— Trump criticized Fed again. WSJ's Nick Timiraos: "Trump repeated his displeasure with higher short-term interest rates set by the Federal Reserve, but said he hadn’t spoken with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell about his frustration because he didn’t want to meddle with monetary policy.vSpeaking to reporters outside the White House on Tuesday, Mr. Trump said he believed the Fed was increasing its benchmark rate too fast given the apparent lack of inflationary pressures in the economy. 'The Fed is doing what they think is necessary but I don’t like what they are doing because we have inflation really in check,' Mr. Trump said. The president said he was concerned higher rates would slow down economic growth. 'You don’t see that inflation coming back,' Mr. Trump said. 'Now, at some point it will…. I just don’t think it’s necessary to go as fast' on rates."
Powell's bold bet. Bloomberg News's Rich Miller: “Powell is pinning his hopes of stopping the U.S. economy from overheating on a variable that a former colleague called 'the most significant unobservable of all:' inflation expectations. In recent public appearances, Powell has argued that the Fed can countenance a fall in joblessness to an almost 50-year low without triggering an inflationary surge in large part because Americans believe the central bank will keep prices under wraps. ‘The key is the anchored expectations,’ he said last week.
"The problem is that it’s not easy to divine what inflation beliefs are and how they might change. What’s more, there’s no measure of where companies -- arguably the most important players in setting prices -- expect the cost of living to go. That makes Powell’s focus on price expectations a potentially risky move as the Fed gradually raises interest rates.”
— Fed's Kaplan supports rate hikes. WSJ's Michael S. Derby: “Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Robert Kaplan said Tuesday he supports the U.S. central bank pressing forward ‘gradually and patiently’ with interest-rate increases. Mr. Kaplan said he was ‘comfortable’ if over the next year or so the Fed raised rates ‘another three times . . . That doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.’ While he acknowledged that knowing the point where monetary policy ceases being stimulative and turns restrictive of growth is quite uncertain, he said he would like to get those rate increases in place, assuming the economy performs as expected, and then take stock of where the economy is. ‘What we do beyond [the three increases], I’ve been candid in saying “I don’t know,' " Mr. Kaplan said.”
— What to look for in bank earnings. WSJ's Telis Demos: “Big U.S. banks are set to report their most profitable third quarter since the financial crisis. But underneath the blockbuster numbers are reasons for caution. Bank profits have been strong this year, thanks in large part to a December law that slashed the tax bill for banks and other corporations. But as the tax cuts become business as usual, investors and analysts have turned their attention to worrying signs about the banks’ future growth. Despite a solid economy with rising interest rates — normally a boon for banking — lending activity hasn’t grown as quickly as hoped, and trading is expected to be lackluster. The season kicks off Friday when JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co. and Citigroup report results.”
— The stock market shouldn't worry yet. CNBC's Patti Domm: “Bonds will become more attractive than stocks only when the 10-year Treasury note yield reaches 5 percent, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch equity strategists. With interest rates rising, Wall Street has been handicapping how high yields can go before the stock market begins to really suffer, and some analysts say the market could start to get nervous as soon as the 10-year touches 3.5 percent. The 10-year reached 3.26 percent early Tuesday before retreating. But the BofAML strategists say it's 5 percent, where the return on equity investments is challenged by the ability to earn yield in the bond market. ‘Asset allocation is a dynamic process, and we would hate to oversimplify. But we tested a few frameworks to determine the 10-yr yield breakpoint at which bonds look more attractive than stocks, and they all spit out the same number: 5%,’ the BofAML strategists wrote.”
— Brexit deal nears. WSJ's Laurence Norman: “British and European negotiators have moved within sight of a deal on Brexit, having narrowed differences over the main sticking point of Northern Ireland. While obstacles remain, negotiators on both sides now believe that London and Brussels could settle an exit agreement in time for a critical summit of European Union leaders next week. That would still leave the two sides to agree on an outline on their future trade and security ties and the U.K. and European parliaments to ratify an exit deal. New optimism has surrounded the talks since British Prime Minister Theresa May emerged unscathed from last week’s annual conference of her Conservative Party. . . . For the whole negotiations to succeed, an agreement on exit terms must be accompanied by a separate accord over the shape of future trade and security relations between the U.K. and the EU, which would be negotiated in detail later after Britain leaves the bloc.”
— Mike Bloomberg is a Democrat again. The billionaire philanthropist and potential 2020 contender announced via Instagram he is formally returning to the party he quit back in 2001 to run for New York mayor. "Last week, Bloomberg announced he would give $20 million to the main Democratic Senate super PAC," The Post's John Wagner writes. "The enormous sum brings Bloomberg — who has already pledged to spend $80 million to support Democratic congressional candidates — up to $100 million in spending commitments for the 2018 election cycle, firmly positioning himself in the Democratic camp as he contemplates a White House bid."
Here's Bloomberg's post:
View this post on Instagram
At key points in U.S. history, one of the two parties has served as a bulwark against those who threaten our Constitution. Two years ago at the Democratic Convention, I warned of those threats. Today, I have re-registered as a Democrat – I had been a member for most of my life – because we need Democrats to provide the checks and balance our nation so badly needs.
— Bill Ackman announces stake in Starbucks. CNBC's Leslie Picker and Liz Moyer: “Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital revealed a new stake in Starbucks on Tuesday at a conference in New York. The fund has 15.2 million shares or about $900 million worth at current prices. Starbucks shares popped more than 2 percent to $57.81 a share amid the news. Ackman's average cost for Starbucks was $51 a share, according to his presentation made at the Grant's Interest Rate Observer conference, which means the hedge fund manager is already up about 13 percent on the investment. ‘If SSS (same store sales) and valuation revert closer to historical average levels, we believe that SBUX shares can more than double over the next three years,’ states the presentation. It's a ‘rare opportunity to own one of the world's best businesses at a discount.’ ”
— SoftBank eyes majority stake in WeWork. WSJ: "SoftBank Group is in discussions to take a majority stake in WeWork Cos., in what would be a giant bet on the eight-year-old provider of shared office space, according to people familiar with the talks. The investment could total between $15 billion and $20 billion and would likely come from SoftBank’s Vision Fund, some of the people said. The $92 billion Vision Fund, which is backed largely by Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi wealth funds as well as by SoftBank, already owns nearly 20% of WeWork after last year committing $4.4 billion in equity funding at a $20 billion valuation."
— JPMorgan fires broker accused of excessive trading. NYT's Tara Siegel Bernard: "J. P. Morgan Securities said this week that it had fired a broker accused of making unauthorized trades in a customer’s account — and reaping fees that were 10 times the typical amount — three months after settling with the customer and several weeks after The New York Times reported on the dispute. The broker, Trevor Rahn, was discharged on Sept. 17, according to a regulatory disclosure filing that cited 'unacceptable practices' related to the 'timing and size of orders entered and resulting transaction charges in a client account.' ... J. P. Morgan confirmed on Monday that it no longer employed Mr. Rahn, but declined to comment further."
— Foreign lobbying reform push blunted by opposition. AP's Richard Lardner: "A push to give the Justice Department more enforcement authority over the lucrative and at times shadowy world of foreign lobbying is stalled amid opposition from pro-business groups, nonprofits and privacy advocates. Organizations that range from the influential U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers have raised objections to legislation that would sharpen the teeth of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The law, enacted 80 years ago to expose Nazi propaganda, requires people to disclose when they lobby in the U.S. on behalf of foreign governments or political entities. While there’s bipartisan support for cracking down on unregistered foreign agents, several of the changes proposed in congressional bills could backfire by sweeping in a host of unintended targets, according to critics. That pushback has effectively kept the legislation from advancing as lobbying groups press for revisions."
— HSBC to pay $765 million to settle mortgage probe. Bloomberg's Tom Schoenberg and Greg Farrell: "HSBC Holdings will pay $765 million to settle allegations that it sold defective residential mortgage-backed securities, resolving one of the last remaining U.S. investigations stemming from the mortgage meltdown a decade ago. The sum, announced Tuesday by U.S. Attorney Bob Troyer in Colorado, is substantially lower than the billions paid by other banks to resolve misconduct linked to these toxic securities. London-based HSBC wasn’t a major player in the market."
— JPMorgan beats back French tax probe. Bloomberg: "JPMorgan Chase won a decisive ruling at France’s top court in its bid to strike down an indictment that ordered the bank to stand trial for helping clients commit tax fraud more than a decade ago. France’s Cour de Cassation ruled last month that a lower court should have thrown out the 2016 indictment after finding that investigators didn’t follow the proper procedures when they interrogated and charged the bank’s Paris unit in 2015... The bank was indicted almost two years ago after French investigators accused it of helping the former chief executive officer of Wendel SA, Jean-Bernard Lafonta, and other managers at the French firm commit tax fraud."
- The Brookings Institution hosts a discussion with Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) and Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper (D) about the economy.
- Securities and Exchange Commission open meeting tomorrow.
- Senate Banking Committee hearing on cryptocurrency and blockchain tomorrow.
- The Bipartisan Policy Center hosts an event titled “Reference rate reform: impact on the economy and consumers” tomorrow.
- Senate Banking Committee hearing on “oversight of pilot programs at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” on Oct. 18.
— A New Yorker cartoon from David Borchart:
Identity of second Russian linked to Skripal poisoning “uncovered”:
What to know about sinkholes:
“I am a voter, are you?”: AMAs get political.