McCain’s never really belonged to the brand of tea party-style Republicans who loved to rail against Obamacare. He criticized the ACA when he needed to, like when he was running for reelection in 2010 and again last year. But McCain didn’t share many of his colleagues’ perspective that virtually anything would be better than President Obama’s health-care law.
Besides, McCain is used to ducking the party line on other issues, too, like campaign finance reform and climate change.
“There’s a certain impulsiveness about McCain, and every once in a while he tends to stray from orthodoxy,” David Berman, a political science professor at Arizona State University, told me.
If there were ever a time for McCain to stray from orthodoxy and do whatever he wants, it’s now. Just a few days before the Senate vote on its "skinny repeal" bill, the 80-year-old announced he has glioblastoma, a common but aggressive form of brain cancer.
So while McCain sees the same realities back home as Arizona’s other senator, Republican Jeff Flake, the two parted ways on Obamacare partly because they are facing far different political situations. McCain, in all likelihood, never has to worry about another election, while Flake is facing a potentially tough reelection race next year.
Speaking of those realities back home, they’re harsh.
Arizona is among the handful of Republican-led states that expanded Medicaid to cover low-income, childless adults. That program, along with new opportunities for coverage through federally subsidized marketplace plans, has provided coverage to half a million Arizonans over the past few years. Arizona’s uninsured rate fell from 17.3 percent in 2009 to 10.8 in 2015 – the 13th-largest drop in the nation during that time.
Arizona, with its expanding retiree population, has also seen its health-care sector explode in recent years. Since 2010 it has experienced the fifth-highest health-care job growth of any state, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
So it was a no-go for McCain when Senate leadership pressured him to support “skinny repeal” that would have destabilized insurance markets without fixing Obamacare’s deepest problems – and could have led to a return of deep Medicaid cuts proposed in the Senate’s replacement bill known as the Better Care Reconciliation Act. State officials had estimated that the BCRA would have cost Arizona’s Medicaid program $7.1 billion by the end of 2026.
“Arizona was about to get screwed, if I may, under this plan," McCain told Phoenix-based radio host Mike Broomhead yesterday.
That’s exactly what Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey was privately worried about, although as a Republican he’d also publicly criticized Obamacare, at times calling it "ground zero" for problems with the law. Three amendments McCain offered to protect Arizona, including one to phase out Medicaid expansion over a decade instead of the seven years envisioned by the BCRA, were at the behest of Ducey. McCain said all along he would center his health-care vote on Ducey's wishes:
McCain’s “no” vote has won him praise among health-care advocates in Arizona. “I think people are pretty pleased with him in the world I work in,” Greg Vigdor, president of the Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, told The Health 202.
But McCain wasn’t just frustrated by the GOP legislation itself – he’d also expressed annoyance all along at the Senate GOP leadership’s secretive process in writing it, at times even mocking the lack of transparency.
“Damned if I know,” McCain responded in May when I asked whether he expects a health-care vote this summer.
Look at the concerns McCain tweeted over the past several weeks:
Business Insider’s Bob Bryan noted McCain's skepticism at the Senate's initial repeal-and-replace bill, the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA):
“Ultimately, I think a lot of it comes down to the unique nature of Sen. McCain as a person and a legislator,” Vigdor said. “He really believes in the Senate as the great bastion of debate and deliberate consideration.”
McCain displayed that love for Senate procedure and regular order in a floor speech he gave on July 25, his first time in the chamber since announcing his cancer diagnosis. In that speech, which Democrats being cut out of the health-care process especially hailed, McCain in strong terms blasted GOP leadership for trying to cram through an unpopular Obamacare repeal measure and called in his party to start reaching across the aisle.
“We’ve tried to do this by coming up with a proposal behind closed doors in consultation with the administration, then springing it on skeptical members, trying to convince them it’s better than nothing, asking us to swallow our doubts and force it past a unified opposition," McCain said. "I don’t think that is going to work in the end."
Boston Globe's Matt Viser noted Democratic leader Chuck Schumer's response to McCain's speech:
Of course McCain, who lost to President Obama in 2008, doesn’t eschew the limelight, either. Reporters hounded him last week after he emerged as one of the chief GOP skeptics of the repeal effort. As he walked into the Senate chamber around 1 a.m. on July 28 for the “skinny repeal” vote, he played coy amid the flood of questions about which way he leaned.
“Watch the show,” McCain told reporters.
He'd warned he'd vote against a repeal-replace bill if it wasn't improved....and then he did, noted HuffPost's Matt Fuller:
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell:
Programming note: The Health 202 will not publish on Monday, Aug. 7 and on Friday, Aug. 11 next week. We’ll be back in your inbox on Tuesday. In the meantime, be sure to read our colleague Tory Newmyer’s The Finance 202 every day next week.
|You are reading The Health 202, our must-read newsletter on health policy.|
|Not a regular subscriber?|
AHH: What better way to mend fences than over a couple of beers? Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke says he's patched things up with Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) after a widely reported dispute over her vote last week against starting the health-care debate, according to the AP.
Zinke had reportedly called Murkowski to threaten repercussions for Alaska if she failed to toe the administration's line on health care. But yesterday Zinke tweeted to his nearly 50,000 followers a photo of himself and Murkowski enjoying Alaskan beers at his Washington home:
Murkowski, who leads the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, was one of two Republicans to vote against starting health-care debate (along with Sen. Susan Collins of Maine) and joined both Colins and McCain to ultimately vote against the "skinny repeal" bill.
OOF: Maybe the Senate's embarrassing failure to pass Obamacare repeal was a blessing in disguise for Republicans. A new poll taken in the days just after the Senate failed to pass a series of different options finds staggering opposition toward the GOP effort. Eighty percent of registered voters in a Quinnipiac University poll -- including 60 percent of self-identified Republicans -- said they disapproved of the way Republicans were handling health care. Just one-fourth of respondents said they were in favor of alternative health-care legislation presented by the Senate.
OUCH: Wait for it, wait for it. Here it is: The House GOP health-care defense is "maybe the Senate didn't manage to pass Obamacare repeal but thank goodness we did." That's essentially how Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.P) responded to constituents yesterday, when they blasted congressional Republicans for getting little done this year even though they control both houses of Congress and the White House.
“For eight horrible years I heard we don’t have control of the House, we don’t have control of the Senate, we don’t have the presidency,” Banker Wire employee Keith Ketzler, 62, said to Ryan, according to the AP. “I’ll tell you what, you’re in there now and all I see is in-fighting. It’s very dysfunctional. I don’t see any plans for anything.”
Ryan said he's worried too -- and noted that the House did pass a health-care bill in May.
“I can make sure that the House delivers," Ryan said. “I don’t run the Senate, I run the House.”
--New Hampshire is notorious for its drug-abuse problems. But Trump didn't do himself any political favors by depicting the entire state as one big "drug den" in s phone call with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto six days after his inauguration. “I won New Hampshire because New Hampshire is a drug-infested den,” Trump told Nieto in a phone call on Jan. 27. The call was private, but The Post's Greg Miller obtained the transcript — plus an equally eyebrow-raising one of a call with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.
There are a few things that could come back to haunt Trump politically based on that one sentence, The Post's Amber Phillips writes. For one thing, Trump ticked off New Hampshire's two senators and its Democratic organization:
From New Hampshire Maggie Hassan (D):
From the New Hampshire Democratic Party:
The state's Republican governor, Chris Sununu, also denounced the drug comment despite previously standing by Trump in sticky campaign situations. Per MSNBC’s Shirley Zilberstein:
Some pushback to the criticism from New Hampshire Republicans:
--August recess has officially commenced, and The Health 202 couldn't be happier. But this is not how Senate Majority Leader MItch McConnell (R-Ky.) wanted to head into the long summer break, which has turned into the perfect storm against his best-laid plans. My colleague Paul Kane has the must-read take:
"Soon after Memorial Day, McConnell drew up a game plan around approving a rewrite of the Affordable Care Act by the end of June. The benefits were twofold, providing House Republicans a few weeks to approve the Senate version and send it to President Trump," Paul writes. "Also, McConnell wanted to create separation between the conclusion of the health-care debate and the start of the annual August recess, providing the month of July to rack up victories on other legislative matters. Such wins would give some Senate Republicans, wary of tackling the health-care issue back home, something else to tout with their voters."
Instead, everything got consumed by the health-care storm, which culminated in the bill failing by a single vote last week. Then yesterday, the Senate left town for a five-week break with no major legislative accomplishments to show for the first seven months of unified Republican control of Congress and the White House.
"When they return after Labor Day, Republicans have to tackle several must-pass bills to fund federal agencies and to increase the Treasury’s borrowing authority. Those are perfunctory tasks, but without the proper tending, failure would result in government shutdowns or worse. That leaves October, maybe, for the point to legislative offense, particularly on the bid to overhaul the tax code....This is the scenario McConnell was trying to avoid back in early June."
A few more good reads from The Post and beyond:
- Congress is officially on recess and will return to Washington on September 5.
President Trump introduces new telehealth initiative for veterans:
Trump: 'Veterans means so much for me and this administration':
What Trump’s golfing habits say about him:
Stephen Colbert wants to serve on Robert Mueller’s grand jury: