Sessions faces a steep uphill battle in his war on pot
The first statement Thursday came from Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), a co-sponsor of a bill that, among multiple efforts, would change federal policy concerning medical marijuana use.
“Parents should be able to give their sick kids the medicine they need without having to fear that they will be prosecuted,” said Gillibrand. “Veterans should be able to come home from combat and use the medicine they need without having to fear they will be prosecuted. This is about public health, and it’s about reforming our broken criminal justice system that throws too many minorities in prison for completely nonviolent offenses.”
Here are 15 possible Democratic presidential candidates for 2020
Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), another co-sponsor of the CARERS Act, but who favors legalizing marijuana outright, said in a statement and a floor speech that Sessions was “determined to revive the failed War on Drugs” and needed to be stopped. (New Jersey may legalize marijuana use this year, after a new Democratic governor is sworn in next week.)
“History has shown that our deeply broken drug laws disproportionately harm low-income communities and communities of color and cost us billions annually in enforcement, incarceration, and wasted human potential, without making us any safer,” said Booker. “This unjust, backwards decision is wrong for America, and will prove to be on the wrong side of history.”
Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.), who launched a 2020 bid for the presidency last year, said in a statement to The Post that he also disagreed with Sessions.
“The Cole Memo provided clear guidance to an otherwise conflicting situation,” said Delaney, using the shorthand for the Obama-era guidance that allowed states such as Colorado and Oregon to maintain legal marijuana markets. “Revoking the Cole Memo will restore that confusion and undermines the will of the voters in several states.”
It was an even easier call for Democrats whose states have legalized marijuana already. Both Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), who have received some attention as potential candidates, swung hard against the decision.
“States like Massachusetts have put a lot of work into implementing common sense marijuana regulations,” said Warren. “This reckless action by the DOJ disrupts the ability of states to enforce their own drug policies and puts our public health and safety at risk. Congress needs to take immediate action to protect state marijuana laws and the patients that rely on them.”
“This is the opposite of what we should be doing,” said Moulton. “Let’s not kid ourselves — people will be using marijuana regardless of what Attorney General Sessions says. We have an obligation to regulate it and make it as safe as possible.”
Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), a former state attorney general, attacked Sessions for misdirecting the DOJ’s resources.
“Instead of wasting money on failed policies like the ‘War on Drugs,’ the Department of Justice should be directing federal resources toward working with local law enforcement to clamp down on transnational criminal organizations and the trafficking of guns and human beings,” said Harris.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), whose adopted state of Vermont is on the verge of decriminalizing marijuana, responded to Sessions by saying federal penalties for marijuana possession should be reduced.
“No, Attorney General Sessions. Marijuana is not the same as heroin,” said Sanders. “No one who has seriously studied the issue believes that marijuana should be classified as a Schedule 1 drug beside killer drugs like heroin. Quite the contrary. We should allow states the right to move toward the decriminalization of marijuana, not reverse the progress that has been made in recent years.”
All of the reactions, in addition to the criticism Sessions got from Republicans, were encouraging to marijuana activists.
“In a weird way, I think the Sessions move might actually help us by accelerating efforts to change federal marijuana laws,” said Tom Angell, the chair of the advocacy group Marijuana Majority. “Whereas until now we’ve sort of been operating in a gray area, I think it’s now clear that a permanent resolution is needed. That is reflected in the fact that so many lawmakers from across the political spectrum are pushing back hard right now.”