“It looks like someone may have flipped a key or something,” Marr told The Washington Post. “That error shortchanged Governor Colyer by 100 votes.”
State elections director Bryan Caskey confirmed the discrepancy.
“I would say it’s not uncommon for there to be mistakes discovered the next morning, keeping in mind [Election Night numbers] are unofficial and we are working as fast as possible to get information to the public,” Caskey said. “Election results are a process, not a night.”
Thomas County elections clerk Shelly Harms said they had submitted 522 votes for Colyer on Tuesday night and a clerical error at the secretary of state’s office caused it to be entered as 422 votes.
To complicate matters, the Haskell County Clerk’s Office said late Thursday afternoon that the secretary of state’s website did not accurately reflect their county’s numbers either. The Haskell County results should show 257 votes for Kobach and 220 votes for Colyer, instead of 110 for Kobach and 103 for Colyer.
The latest adjustments mean Kobach’s lead over Colyer has been reduced to 121 votes.
Colyer refused to concede the race Wednesday, saying there were still thousands of provisional and mail-in ballots left to count. This newly discovered error only reinforced his resolve, Marr said.
“This is exactly why we have canvass. It’s exactly why we should be checking our math,” Marr said. “This is exactly why Governor Colyer will make sure every legitimate vote is counted in this election.”
Preliminary results Wednesday showed Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state who previously served as vice chairman of Trump’s now-disbanded voting integrity commission, had 126,257 votes to Colyer’s 126,066, with 100 percent of precincts reporting.
Kobach on Wednesday acknowledged that the results of the race could change as provisional ballots were counted but said he would begin campaigning immediately as if he were the winner.
“We have only three months [until the general election], and if we spend a week of that three months doing absolutely nothing, then we will have given our opponents a sizable lead in the footrace that we have,” Kobach said at a news conference Wednesday. “So it is imperative that we begin running . . . with the full knowledge that I may hand the baton off to Jeff.”
On Thursday, Colyer’s campaign said the governor, like Kobach, would also continue campaigning as if he would be representing the Republican Party in November.
“Well, we are going to continue running as if we are the nominee at this point,” Marr said. “There’s no reason not to continue to operate [so] until we find out otherwise.”
They have reason to want to get a jump on campaigning for the general election: The winner of the Republican primary will face the projected Democratic nominee, state Sen. Laura Kelly, and independent candidate Greg Orman in November. Kelly earned more than 50 percent of the vote Tuesday, in the state’s first contested Democratic primary since 1998.
Both parties are also aware that, since the 1960s, Kansas voters have not elected consecutive Democrats or Republicans to the governor’s office. This year, the GOP in Kansas also must overcome the additional obstacle of convincing voters that conservative policies can still succeed in Kansas after then-Gov. Sam Brownback (R) enacted steep tax cuts that left the state’s economy, infrastructure funding and education systems reeling.
That may be more of a challenge for Kobach, who has vowed to cut taxes further and reduce the size of state government agencies. Democrats, however, see a Kobach candidacy giving them a better chance of taking back the office in November because he swings so far to the right, according to University of Kansas political scientist Burdett Loomis.
“Their working assumption is Kobach is, for Democrats, the better choice to run against,” Loomis said. “Even with an independent in the race, if you’re [a Democrat] running against a Republican with a ceiling that might be in the mid- to low-40s, you can find a path to win.”
Kansas law does not call for an automatic recount in close races. Candidates may request a recount, and the cost is borne by the candidate or the counties, depending on the result.
At Wednesday’s news conference, Kobach acknowledged his dual role as partisan gubernatorial candidate and nonpartisan state elections official. He said if a recount were requested in the race, the votes would be tallied at the county level but that his office would act simply as a coordinating entity.
Kobach is not required by law to recuse himself from the recount process. Even so, some independent experts and Kobach critics have called on the secretary of state to recuse himself from the process entirely, arguing that his role as a candidate presents a conflict of interest. Kobach said Thursday night that he will remove himself from the further counting of votes, the Associated Press reported, but he said that the move will be “symbolic,” because counties do the work of counting votes
Colyer demanded Thursday that Kobach stop advising county election officials.
Colyer’s campaign said it had not focused on whether it would ask Kobach to recuse himself from the process in the event of a recount.
“We’re certainly not at a recount right now,” Marr said. “We need to finish the original count.”