Should you be surprised that Kanye West and Kim Kardashian gave their new daughter such a weird name? No: Be surprised that they gave her such a banal name.

West and Kardashian in December. (Alan Diaz / AP)
West and Kardashian in December. (Alan Diaz / AP)

North West — the name officially confirmed by her birth certificate — might have a high quirk factor. But its branding potential falls far short of what we’d expect from the historic merger of two marketing-savvy megalomaniacs. Names like Blue Ivy and Suri are instantly identified with the celeb kid in question. But “North West” registered only a modest Google Trend blip this weekend compared with past big news out of North West Australia, North West England and northwestern Pakistan. Said one Web-search expert: “It would take a nearly infinite amount of reality-TV exposure for her to outrank a geospatial coordinate.”

While Jay-Z and Beyoncé rushed to trademark “Blue Ivy,” there are already scads of claims for a variety of purposes on “North West” (and variants like “NW”). “In trademark terms, it would be a diluted market,” said Chris Ott, an intellectual-property lawyer at the D.C. firm of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease — though it’s possible to make a seemingly generic term valuable (think American Airlines) with just enough PR, he noted.  “If there’s anyone who can push through a fight on this, they can.” Assuming they want to. Who knows, maybe they wanted a baby name that could just blend in.

See also: Kanye West on the meaning of love

Also in The Reliable Source:

Barbara Walters’s retirement: Buckle up, it’s going to be bumpy year of tributes

‘White House Down’ premiere in Washington: Channing Tatum, Jamie Foxx, Maggie Gyllenhaal

Hey, isn’t that . . . ?: Bruno Mars

Elisabeth Moss speaks at Vocus conference: Not ad exec, but plays one on TV

Paula Deen dropped by Food Network after third apology

Rand Paul makes doughnut jokes about Capitol Police at CEI gala

Rep. Joe Kennedy brings the family business back to D.C.