"The early data is unprecedented," Riddell said during Sunday's media conference in D.C.
Riddell and his colleagues are working on immunotherapy. While chemotherapies attack tumors and cancer cells directly — usually causing significant damage to healthy tissues in the process — immunotherapy is about finding ways to help the human immune system fight off cancer cells the way it would attack foreign bacteria or a virus. Cancer cells are adept at outlasting or hiding from immune responses, so immunologists have to find ways to trigger the immune system to act out anyway.
Cancer was killing her. She tried immunotherapy.
Jill O'Donnell-Tormey, chief executive of the Cancer Research Institute, said 2015 was "a truly special year for cancer immunotherapy" — and more than half of active clinical cancer trials use some form of it. With the White House set to fund a cancer "moonshot" to the tune of $1 billion, many are looking to immunotherapy as the best hope for a cure — or at least a much better treatment — for cancer.
According to Riddell, his team's studies on a technique called adoptive T cell therapy are seeing stupendous results. In this process, doctors take white blood cells called T cells from cancer patients and genetically modify them, giving them tags that will help them to target specific cancer cells in the body. The doctors then allow these cells to multiply and reintroduce them into the body, providing patients with a super-charged immune system tailored to fight the cancerous cells inside of them. In theory, these cells could keep protecting the body from cancerous invasions long after the initial treatment.
Personalized cancer vaccines have already helped treat three patients
The research is yet to be published, which means it hasn't been peer-reviewed (vouched for by scientists outside of the study), and is tough to evaluate. But the data Riddell is reporting is indeed impressive. In one study, the therapy eliminated all symptoms in 94 percent of participants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, with other blood cancers showing response rates greater than 80 percent. More than half the subjects reportedly experienced complete remission.
And these patients are ones who seemed sick beyond all hope.
"We have very high rates of complete responses in patients that have failed all other conventional therapies, including bone marrow transplantation," Riddell said during the briefing.
But the BBC reports that seven of the patients had immune responses so severe they ended up in intensive care — and two of those patients died as a result.
These risks are the biggest hurdle for immunotherapy to overcome. But even ignoring the potentially fatal side-effects, which Riddell hopes could be avoided by using lower doses of the therapy, the treatment has a long way to go before we can hail it as a catch-all cure for cancer. For now, it has only been used to treat cancers of the blood.
Not even the excited researchers behind the findings really think this will be a cancer "cure." What they hope is that their therapy can finally usher immunotherapy into the ranks of standard cancer treatment — something that could be used routinely alongside chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical interventions.
The team will keep working on ways to make their technique safer and more effective for all types of cancer. And when their results are formally published, other researchers can assess just how revolutionary the therapy truly is.
Scientists are using herpes to treat skin cancer — and it’s working
Sequencing the genome creates so much data we don’t know what to do with it
Can mammogram-reading pigeons help train human radiologists? An animal behaviorist weighs in.
What cancer in clams might tell us about cancer in humans
Why groundbreaking new cancer drugs still don’t work for most patients