The Washington Post

Lena Dunham is way nicer than she had to be about Jezebel photo controversy

(Annie Leibovitz/Vogue)

Well, Lena Dunham is a lot nicer than we would have been in her situation. The “Girls” creator and star was calm and mature in responding to a recent  Jezebel controversy, simply saying the feminist Web site’s $10,000 attempt to get un-photoshopped images of her Vogue cover shoot was “messed up.”

Sitting down for an interview with Grantland’s Bill Simmons, Dunham said the stunt “felt gross” — but then even slightly defended the site, saying that she sympathizes with having to produce a large amount of content. “I think Jezebel can be really smart and funny,” Dunham offered about the site that pointed out her every small flaw when the photos emerged and had been very minimally edited. “I just think it’s like, once you’ve been attacked in that way, it’s hard to enjoy once you feel like they’ve made such a monumental error in their approach to feminism.”

Perhaps Dunham knows that if she unleashed a truly angry rant against the site (which has become famous for exposing just how much magazines edit celebrity images on magazine covers) it would draw even more attention to the incident that already received lots of nasty backlash from around the Internet and Jezebel’s own fans. Simmons speculated that in retrospect, the site’s authors probably know the idea was a bad one. Dunham seemed to think about this, and said she didn’t talk to the author who wrote the post, but said carefully, “I can’t imagine the reaction made her feel particularly great.”

She did sound more annoyed talking about how she was personally scared to see the un-retouched images, thinking, “Maybe I’m delusional and I don’t look how I think I look.” Then, when it was clear the photos had only had a small amount of retouching (“I felt like, thank you for removing the one line from my face because I’m 27-years-old and shouldn’t have that there”), the site still stuck to its originally storyline.

“Instead of going like, ‘Hey, we kinda (expletive) up, these pictures aren’t that retouched…they were like, ‘She’s not retouched, but she could have been,'” Dunham said. “It was this weird almost, like, political maneuvering that I just had a lot of trouble respecting.”

Again: Way nicer than she had to be.

Emily Yahr covers pop culture and entertainment for the Post. Follow her on Twitter @EmilyYahr.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Be a man and cry
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A flood of refugees from Syria but only a trickle to America
Chicago's tacos, four ways
Play Videos
What you need to know about filming the police
What you need to know about trans fats
Syrian refugee: 'I’m committed to the power of music'
Play Videos
Riding the X2 with D.C.'s most famous rapper
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Ron Charles · February 21, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.