The Washington Post

Why the ‘none of these candidates’ option matters in Nevada (and why it doesn’t)

If there's a state where the electoral process most resembles a standardized test, it's Nevada. For years, voters casting statewide ballots have been given the unique option of choosing "none of these candidates."

Until now.


(Ted S. Warren/AP)

A judge struck the option from the ballot Wednesday with a ruling that, at first glance, looks like good news for Republicans who pressed for the choice to be shelved. But history shows the "none of these candidates" variable wouldn't likely swing the outcome of the presidential race in the Silver State — unless it is very, very close.

As AP notes, the option to choose "none" was designed as a countermeasure against apathy following the Watergate scandal that brought down Richard Nixon. Earlier this year, Republicans financed a lawsuit to get rid the choice.

Why? Largely because of the incumbent at the top of the ticket, about whom most voters have formed an opinion.

The idea is that voters unimpressed with President Obama's four-year record but not impressed enough by Mitt Romney might go with the option of neither. If voters don't have that option, they might be tempted to go with the alternative to the status quo, which is Romney. Similarly, voters lukewarm about Romney who are not considering voting for Obama could opt for neither. But the absence of the "none" could notch the Republican a few more anti-Obama voters.

"Few" is the key word here. A review of recent presidential election tallies reveals that a very small slice of the Nevada electorate has tended to prefer the "none" option.

In 2008, less than one in a hundred voters (0.65 percent of the electorate) decided to cast a ballot for "none of these candidates." In 2004, less than half of one percent (0.44 percent) chose the option.

"It hasn't gotten more than 2 percent in any presidential race since 1976," noted Nevada political analyst Jon Ralston.

In other words, the 2012 race would have to be awfully tight for "none" (or its absence) to be a deciding factor.

That's not to say such a thing can't happen, or hasn't happened. In 1998, incumbent Democratic Sen. Harry Reid (D) defeated Republican John Ensign by just 400 votes, when over 8,000 voters cast ballots for "none."

More recently, the 2010 Senate election shows that even in a race with two flawed candidates, "none" did not attract all that many votes. A little over 2 percent of the electorate chose the option that year, in a race Reid won by about six points.

Recent polling on the Silver State Senate race shows a single digit contest between Sen. Dean Heller (R) and Rep. Shelley Berkley (D). So a couple of percentage points could matter if the race remains tight. And in the context of the broader race for an upper chamber majority, the stakes are even higher.

The presidential race also looks very competitive. Still, it's worth bearing in mind that "none" hasn't cracked the 1 percent threshold in the last three presidential elections.

Nevada's Democratic secretary of state has vowed an appeal of the ruling striking down the "none" choice. The legal battle appears to be unfinished, but its ultimate outcome may not dramatically impact the marquee statewide elections.

Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Republicans debate Saturday night. The New Hampshire primary is on Feb. 9. Get caught up on the race.
Heading into the next debate...
Donald Trump returns to the Republican presidential debate stage Saturday night. Marco Rubio arrives as a sudden star, but fending off ferocious attacks from his rivals. Still glowing from his Iowa victory, Ted Cruz is trying to consolidate conservative support, while Ben Carson is struggling to avoid being typecast as the dead man walking.
Listen
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She's planning to head Sunday to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
56% 36%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 6: GOP debate

on ABC News, in Manchester, N.H.

Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.