The Washington Post

Why ‘are you better off’ is tough for Obama, in two charts

President Obama's fate in November rests largely on the question of whether the country believes he has improved the economy. That's why Democrats and Republicans have been wrangling over the "are you better off" question so often in recent weeks.

A new chart from the Pew Research Center illustrates one factor that could make it more difficult to the president and his allies to to make the case that things are better: The recovery, at least in one respect, doesn't look all that different from the recession.

The chart shows that median household income in the two years after the most recent recession fell at a rate that nearly equaled its drop during the recession itself (the National Bureau of Economic Research judged that the most recent recession ended in June of 2009).

Much of the economic debate in the presidential race revolves around jobs, with Republicans pointing to disappointing monthly jobs reports and the nation’s unemployment rate, and Democrats noting the private sector job gains that have taken place under Obama's watch. But income is also a tangible metric for a lot of voters, and the static nature of the numbers is not encouraging for the president's case on the "are you better off" question.

This isn't the first time in history that median household income has continued to drop in the years following a recession. It happened after the recession at the beginning of the last two decades, as a second Pew chart shows:

But in both of those cases, the decline slowed from its rate during the recession. In the case of the most recent recession, it remained about the same in the aftermath.

All of this does not mean that it is impossible for Obama to make an overall case that the the country is better off financially than it was four years ago -- it just makes it harder. And he's already facing an uphill climb: the latest CNN/ORC International poll showed that a plurality of likely voters said they were worse off financially than they were four years ago.

Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.