The Washington Post

Why was President Obama so bad?

The Barack Obama who stood on the debate stage in Denver Wednesday night was virtually unrecognizable to the person who swept to victory in 2008 or even the man who had built a narrow-but-clear edge in the 2012 race.

 In the wake of the debate, Democrats conceded that former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney had dominated the proceedings and quickly moved on to a deeper -- and harder  to answer -- question: What the hell was wrong with the president?

Theories abound -- up to an including that Obama, who had done debate prep in Las Vegas, struggled to adjust to Denver's altitude. (Not kidding. That is a theory espoused by none other than former Vice President Al Gore.)

Below we take on a few of the likeliest reasons for Obama's out-of-character performance -- culled from conversations with Democratic strategists and our own observations.

* He's not used to being challenged: For all of the chatter that President Obama loves to surround himself with people willing to disagree with him, the truth of the matter is that being the leader of the free world means that what you say goes pretty much all the time. And, being challenged by staff -- no matter how senior those staff might be -- is not the same thing as being directly confronted by someone at your level and who wants your job.  Obama seemed to vacillate between flummoxed and annoyed that Romney was contradicting almost every assertion he tried to make. Sidebar: That "Well, I am the president" tendency goes a long way to explaining why incumbents -- George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter -- tend to be regarded as losers in the first general election debate.

*  He was tired: Obama looked world-weary at best and downright grim at worst during the debate. And, his inability (or unwillingness) to go after Romney's record -- or rebut some of Romney's claims about his own -- gave off the impression that Obama just wasn't well prepared enough to do so.  It's understandable for a president to be a little worn down -- he is the president after all -- but it's up to he and his staff to understand that these debates matter a lot and that just assuming you will be able to fake it until you make it isn't good enough.

* He's not that good a debater: Over the weekend, Obama told a crowd in Nevada that he was only an "okay" debater. At the time, the political world rolled its eyes -- chalking it up the sort of expectation lowering that is now de rigeur in these sorts of political moments. Turns out, Obama might have been giving an honest assessment of his debate abilities.  As last night's debate was unfolding, we thought back to the 2008 general election debates where Obama was solid but far from spectacular.  Or even to the 2008 primary debates where, for the most part, then Sen. Hillary Clinton outperformed him.  Obama is, without question, the most gifted speaker in politics right now. (Bill Clinton is not, technically, in politics at the moment.)  But, as a debater, he is not in that same elite class. 

* He got screwed by Jim Lehrer:  On the morning after the debate, the most prominent talking point on the left was that moderator Jim Lehrer had aided and abetted Romney's victory by refusing to enforce the rules of the debate or inject facts when the Republican was clearly straying from them. While the debate was clearly not Lehrer's best moment, it's hard to lay all the blame for Obama's poor performance at the moderator's feet. If Obama felt like Lehrer wasn't doing enough to fact-check Romney in real time, why didn't he take it upon himself to do it? 

Read more from PostPolitics:

Six reasons Mitt Romney won the first debate

#FactCheckThis: Statements in the first debate

Romney backers say presidential race is ‘reset’

Say What: Watch the debate with real-time analysis from Post reporters

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is today. Get caught up on the race.
What to expect in the New Hampshire primary
The Post's Philip Bump says ...
Since he proclaimed that he'd win New Hampshire last summer, Bernie Sanders has seen a swing of about 50 points in his direction. Impressive. But not as impressive as the guy on the other side of the political aisle. Donald Trump has led the Republican field in New Hampshire for almost 200 days, and has held a lead in 51 straight live-caller polls -- every poll stretching back to last July.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the state.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont.
56% 41%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.