The Washington Post

Mitt Romney doesn’t have a woman problem — at least not yet

In the wake of Mitt Romney's comment in Tuesday night's debate that he had requested  "binders full of women" to fill cabinet posts when he was governor of Massachusetts, Democrats quickly sought to seize on the remark as yet more evidence that the GOP nominee just doesn't get it when it comes to female voters.

Conference calls were organized, tweets were, um, tweeted, and even President Obama made reference to the Romney "binder" comments during a Wednesday rally in Mt. Vernon, Iowa and then again today in Manchester, New Hampshire.

For all of the time and energy Democrats devoted to "binders" -- and to the broader "war against women" allegedly being carried about by Republicans -- there is little evidence in polling (at least not yet) that Romney is underperforming the gender gap that has been in place between the two parties since 1992. 

Here's a look at the Obama versus Romney head-to-head among female registered voters in Washington Post-ABC News polling dating back to the spring:

In early April as Romney was emerging bruised from a contested Republican primary fight, he clearly had work to do in terms of healing relationships with female voters. But, subsequent polls suggest he has done that; in the three Post-ABC polls conducted since September, Romney has trailed Obama by 7, 10 and 9 points among registered voters.

And it's not just registered voters. Among likely female voters the story is similar. Here's that chart since late August:

Let's assume for the sake of argument that Romney loses women on Nov. 6 by 8.5 points -- his average deficit in those three polls among registered voters. (His average deficit among likely voters in those same three polls was 7 points.)

That would be a better showing among women than John McCain made in 2008 (lost women by 13), George Bush made in 2000 (lost women by 11) and Bob Dole made in 1996 (lost women by 16). It would be roughly equal to the eight-point margin that George H.W. Bush lost women to Bill Clinton in 1992.

So, for all of the chatter about Romney's women problems, he is currently positioned to do as well or better than every Republican presidential candidate among female voters save one: George W. Bush in 2004 who lost among women by just three points to Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry.

Now, there are a few caveats worth noting here.

First, what the polls among women look like today may not be what they look like in 19 days time. The Obama campaign is pushing hard to make the "binders" comments -- as well as what Romney had to say on abortion during the GOP primary process -- a centerpiece of its closing argument and, given that emphasis, there is the real possibility that the numbers could shift.

Second, what the Obama team is clearly hoping to do with their renewed focus on women is not convince every woman in the country to vote for the incumbent but rather to speak directly to suburban women -- who tend to be fiscally conservative and socially moderate/liberal -- living in places like Virginia and Colorado that Romney is simply an unacceptable alternative for them. And, there are some swing state polls that show Obama with a much wider margin over Romney among women; he led the GOP nominee by 18 points among women in a recent Pennsylvania poll conducted by Quinnipiac University, for example.)

Neither of those twin realities, however, change the underlying poll reality: Mitt Romney is currently doing no worse -- and in several cases far better -- than past Republican presidential nominees among women.  

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
Quoted
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 18%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

the-fix

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.