The Washington Post

The Republican brand problem — and why fixing it won’t be easy

Asked to name the single thing that they disliked the most about the Republican party, one in five people in a new Gallup poll said the GOP was "inflexible" or "unwilling to compromise."


A stop sign. AFP/Getty photo.

That's bad -- but it doesn't capture the full magnitude of the brand problems that Republicans are currently dealing with. Two other numbers in the Gallup survey do that.

The first is 26 percent -- as in one in four Republicans saying the thing they dislike about their own party is that it is too uncompromising. That is at least as high as the number of Democrats (22 percent) who said the same thing and higher than the number of independents (17 percent).

That more than one in four Republicans think their own side is too inflexible speaks not only to the divide between the conservative and establishment wings of the party -- nothing shocking there -- but also, and this is somewhat new, to the size of the group who thinks the GOP is simply too hard line.

The second, and more important data point, is that the second most-mentioned critique of the party -- 14 percent named it -- by self-identified GOPers is that they "don't stand up for their positions" and "give in too easily." And, when asked the things they like about their party, the three most-mentioned traits are "better fiscal management/budget cuts/less debt", "conservative views" and "favor smaller government."

Rock, meet hard place.

Republicans want Republicans to compromise. But giving way on the budget and size of government strikes at the party’s raison d’etre. Compromising on those sorts of things -- like the party did in the fiscal cliff deal with President Obama in late 2012 -- is likely to lose the party more of its adherents than it gains it in converts. And, as any party strategist will tell you, a party without a base isn't much of a party.

So, what the party compromises on then matters -- a lot.  And, that's why making a deal on immigration may well be the best chance the GOP has to change the perception that they are allergic to deal-making.

Why? Because it's something of a nothing-burger to their base -- 2 percent volunteer the party’s stance on immigration as a top beef they have with the GOP while 1 percent name it as a positive thing for their side -- and it could well allow the GOP to court Hispanics if the party can play an active role in putting together a comprehensive immigration reform proposal.

What the numbers from Gallup make clear is that simply making a deal to make a deal won't help Republicans convince the public -- or their party -- that the image of the GOP is wrong.  But, picking a high profile place or two -- climate change, perhaps? -- to cut deals might very well allow Republicans to keep their base behind them while shattering the negative image too many Americans have of them as hardened ideologues on every issue.

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Quoted
We'll have half a million voters in South Carolina. I can shake a lot of hands, but I can't shake that many.
Sen. Marco Rubio, speaking to a group of reporters about his strategy to regain support after a poor performance in the last debate
Fact Checker
Sanders’s claim that Clinton objected to meeting with ‘our enemies’
Sanders said that Clinton was critical of Obama in 2008 for suggesting meeting with Iran. In fact, Clinton and Obama differed over whether to set preconditions, not about meeting with enemies. Once in office, Obama followed the course suggested by Clinton, abandoning an earlier position as unrealistic.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

the-fix

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.