The Washington Post

It wasn’t always this bad. The growth of political polarization, in 1 chart.

Earlier today, we wrote on one of the main underpinnings of political polarization in the country -- the deep split on what the proper role of government should be.

In response to that post, one reader pointed us to this fascinating survey on polarization in the Senate as shown through voting records of all 100 senators over a two year period.

(The paper was co-written a by a political scientist at Duke University and one at the University of North Carolina. If those two schools can come together, can't we all?)

What the duo did was analyze the voting records to find similarities. They then grouped those similarities -- Yahoo's Chris Wilson did a similar experiment here -- into a single chart comparing the likelihood of uniform party line voting over time.

Their conclusion? "We have not seen the current level of partisanship since the early 1900s," write James Moody of Duke and Peter Mucha of UNC.  Later, they add: "In the current era, middle positions seem fragile and even longtime middle residents follow party lines (Jim Jeffords) or lose their seats (Lincoln Chafee)."

Good times.

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.
Next Story
Rachel Weiner · June 5, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.