The Washington Post

The rise of the filibuster: A Fix read

The debate over whether to change Senate rules to allow filibusters of executive nominees to be broken by a simple majority has consumed the world's greatest deliberative body for the entirety of the day -- and the fight looks likely to extend into next week.

We've written posts on the best Republican argument against the rule change and the best Democratic argument for the change.  Now we wanted to bring you a nonpartisan view on how we got here when it comes to the use of the filibuster in the Senate. That view comes from University of Miami political science professore Gregory Koger.

Koger, in a piece entitled "The Rise of the 60-Vote Senate", explains not only the history of filibustering but also where we stand now.  He writes:

"The modern Senate is dramatically different from the Senate of the mid-twentieth century. While senators valued compromise and cooperation, the default practice was that a simple majority was sufficient to pass
legislation. Filibusters were rare and spectacular exceptions. Now the default assumption is that a cloture-sized  majority is necessary for any action. This system empowers legislative minorities to pursue a range of interests.  Some proposals are blocked by filibusters, but others are forced onto the legislative agenda by minority hostage taking. As a result, the Senate is a less efficient chamber than the U.S. House, but it is also likely to discuss and  vote on a wider range of issues than the House will allow."

The full text of Koger's piece is below. It's a fascinating read.

The Rise of the 60-Vote Senate

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Listen
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Listen
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.