The Washington Post

The least productive Congress ever

Congress, in case you have been living on another planet for the last few years, doesn't do all that much these days.

The Capitol building hasn't been getting much done these days.

There's plenty of reasons for that but the largest is that House Republicans have been riven by factionalism that, when combined with Democrats unwilling to cross the aisle to lend support for the GOP's agenda has made passing anything extremely difficult.

(The farm bill in the House is a good example of this trend. After the initial farm bill vote failed thanks to the revolt of five dozen Republicans, a second bill, which stripped out provisions for food stamps, was approved without a single Democratic vote.)

So, how does this House stack up against past years when it comes to productivity? Not so well, according to the new Vital Statistics on Congress, which shows that the 112th Congress passed just 561 bills, the lowest number since they began keeping these stats way back in 1947.

The second lowest number of bills passed in a single Congress -- 611 -- was back in the 104th Congress, the two-year session that followed Republicans re-taking control of the House in 1994 after four decades of Democratic control.

An important caveat: A raw count of bills passed is a decidedly simplistic way to measure true legislative productivity. Not all legislation is created equal; some bills matter more in the grand sweep of things. So, passing some sort of immigration legislation isn't really the same thing as naming post offices and the like. But, it's seen that way in this chart.

Still, it's quite clear that this Congress didn't exactly tear it up legislatively speaking over the past two years. What's all the more remarkable about the relative dearth of bills passed through the House in the 112th Congress is the incredibly high number of recorded votes that took place over that same time period. There were 1,607 recorded votes in the 112th Congress, the fifth highest total since Vital Stats began collecting data. (Also worth noting: Three of the five Congresses with the most recorded votes have been the last six years.)

So, the House was voting more but passing less. Republicans will ascribe that seeming contradiction to Democrats forcing pointless procedural votes to slow things down. Democrats will insist it's the result of a hyper-ideological majority that has refused to even consider working across the partisan aisle.

Either way, the conclusion is clear: The 112th Congress got less done than any Congress in more than six decades.

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Sean Sullivan · July 17, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.