The Washington Post

How John Boehner couldn’t win

Conventional wisdom is set. Speaker John Boehner lost -- big time -- in the government shutdown debate. He stuck with demands from the very conservative wing 0f the GOP to defund/delay/alter President Obama's health-care law even after it became crystal clear that neither the White House nor Senate Democrats would ever approve a measure to fund the government that contained Obamacare provisions in it.  He repeatedly tried to rally his conference behind alternate plans -- including his gambit on Tuesday to pass legislation to force the Senate's hand -- and watched those efforts collapse. Amid those failures, the Republican brand slid into the gutter of American politics, reaching historic lows in a series of national polls.  The conclusion: Boehner gambled and lost. He picked a strategy and he picked wrong.

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) attends a news conference following a meeting of House Republicans on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. (European Pressphoto Agency/Michael Reynolds)

But what if Boehner didn't have any choice? What if he didn't pick the strategy but the strategy picked him? That's the argument made to us by a Republican consultant loyal to Boehner. Here's the relevant part of his e-mail:

"Had Boehner not pursued his course of action the past two weeks, the conference would have fractured and the entire leadership would have faced some sort of challenge. Even some of the more rational members of the conference needed this confrontation over the debt and Obamacare. He did what he had to do to keep his conference intact."

By that logic, Boehner had no choice. Had he gone forward with his initial plan on the shutdown -- allowing a symbolic defund Obamacare vote in the House that could have been stripped from the continuing resolution by the Senate and then sent straight to President Obama -- there would almost certainly have been a revolt in the ranks from tea party conservatives, who saw this fiscal pinch point as their last, best chance to fundamentally alter a law that they hate (and that word is not an exaggeration for their feelings about Obamacare). Such a schism would have ensured that the Republican Party -- in the House at least -- was non-functioning all the way through the 2014 midterms (and maybe longer). Boehner, his allies argue, did the only thing he could to keep the conference close to united.

Seen from that angle, it's quite clear that Boehner faced a no-win situation in the fiscal fight -- and, in truth, maybe from the start of his speakership given how he approached the job. He defined his mission as speaker as, well, speaking for the entirety of the Republican conference. That's a worthy goal but one that, given the current state of the House GOP, is entirely unattainable. Boehner's error was in realizing far too late that consensus was a pipe dream. By trying to massage the GOP conference to agreement that it simply couldn't (and maybe didn't want to) arrive at, Boehner set himself up to fail.

In retrospect, he would have been better served by saying something like this to his conference in early 2011: "Look, you aren't going to agree with me on every move I make. None of you. But, you are either with me or against me. I need to know now. If you can't deal with someone who is going to occasionally move the conference in a direction you don't agree with, you need to say so right now. We need to be a team, not a group of individuals."  He needed to force people to pick sides way back when. You are either on the team or off the team. Of course, given the makeup of the House conference, it's uniquely possible that saying something like that would have meant that Boehner would never have become Speaker in the first place.

Lose-lose. Big time.

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.