The Washington Post

Why you won’t hear as much about abortion from Wendy Davis as you might expect

Texas State Sen. Wendy Davis (D) is best known for her marathon filibuster of antiabortion legislation that catapulted her into the state and national consciousness.

If that's still Davis's calling card at the end of her run for governor, the Democrat's long-shot bid will almost certainly be headed for defeat. Nobody realizes this more than Davis and her campaign.

The Texas Tribune's Becca Aaronson discusses what the partial rejection of Texas' abortion law means for gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis. (The Washington Post)

Just look at her reaction to a decision by a federal judge Monday to block two key provisions of the law that she fought against in the legislature. As the Houston Chronicle's Kiah Collier observed, missing from Davis's response was the word "abortion." Collier writes:

"Texas families are stronger and healthier when women across the state have access to quality health care," the statement read. "I'm not surprised by the judge's ruling. As a mother, I would rather see our tax dollars spent on improving our kids' schools than defending this law."

Asked whether the reference to health care in the first sentence includes abortion procedures, Davis spokeswoman Rebecca Acuña said, "No."

Enough said.

The simple explanation for Davis's tack is Texas politics. The state leans conservative on social issues, meaning Davis's abortion law fight is not going to endear her to the center-right voters she will need to peel away from Attorney General Greg Abbott (R), who is a heavy, heavy favorite to win next year.

It's a reminder that what gets pols to the point at which they can try to move up to higher office isn't necessarily what they need to underscore in their next campaign.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R), for example, is set to cruise to a second term in no small part because of the way he has leaned into a bipartisan message in his deep blue state, including his highly-publicized embrace of President Obama in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.

Winning a second term would put Christie in a great position to launch a 2016 bid for president. If he runs, don't expect him to portray a warm and fuzzy relationship with Obama in his bid to win over the partisan activists and voters who decide the Republican nomination.

Something similar is going on with Davis. Her filibuster helped her build valuable name recognition that would otherwise require millions of dollars worth of introductory advertising. And it certainly didn't hurt her fundraising, bringing her cash from outside the state that probably wouldn't have otherwise flowed in her direction.

But the moment Davis launched her campaign, she made clear that her main focus is on education, not abortion. It wasn't her abortion filibuster Davis mentioned in her kickoff address, but rather her 2011 filibuster of education cuts. (Note that in her Monday statement, she also mentioned education.)

Davis will have to find a sweet spot between (1) keeping the energy level up among the donors, activists and voters who support her and know her because of her abortion filibuster and expect her to continue the fight, and (2) not alienating more moderate and conservative voters who will be turned off by her position in favor of abortion rights. And she will have to do that as conservative groups will no doubt tie her to national Democrats and seek to cast her as an extremist on abortion.

All in all, it means Davis faces nothing short of  a monumental challenge. That's why she remains a major underdog against Abbott.

Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.