The Washington Post

Science rules? Not in Congress.

And then there was one.

Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.), right, received a demonstration from IBM’s Michael Holmes of new proposed capabilities for the Watson supercomputer on Capitol Hill last May. (Emi Kolawole)

One physicist in the halls of Congress, that is. Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.) announced Tuesday that he will retire at the end of his term, leaving hopes that Congress will retain a physicist in its ranks squarely on the shoulders of Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.).

As Capitol Hill's resident physics experts, Holt and Foster belong to a rare breed: scientists-turned-members of Congress.

Looking for a microbiologist? You'll find one: Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.). How about engineers? Six. There are 19 physicians, two dentists, two veterinarians and three psychologists, all according to a Congressional Research Service profile of the 113th Congress.

In short, even under a very broad definition of scientist, only about three dozen members fall into the category. Compare that to the 214 members from both chambers who have worked in business. Or the 211 who have a background in law.

There you have it: scientific proof of the dearth of scientists in Congress.

Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.
Next Story
Sean Sullivan · February 18, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.