The Washington Post

Tom Steyer suggests $100 million might not be enough in 2014

Billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer plans to spend big money making an impact in the 2014 midterm elections. Like $100 million big, according to a report. But in an interview Tuesday, Steyer suggested that elevating the most crucial climate and environmental issues of the day in the eyes of the public might require even more money.

"If you said to me, how much would I be willing to spend, to make this what I believe it is, the most important issue in the minds of Americans, then I would think 100 million bucks would be very low, honestly," he said in an interview on C-SPAN's "Newsmakers" that will air Sunday.

Tom Steyer poses for a portrait on Saturday, January 26, 2012, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post)

The New York Times reported in February that Steyer plans to spend as much as $100 million on 2014 races, split evenly between a $50 million personal donation and $50 million in contributions from major donors. When pressed on a specific dollar figure Tuesday, Steyer refused to commit to one.

"Trying to say what you're going to spend or how it's going to play out is pretty unrealistic," he said.

Steyer's not yet telegraphing the list of races in which he plans to get involved. He said he anticipated getting involved in "eight or more" contests including the Florida governor's race and the Iowa Senate contest. Steyer anticipated firming up his plans around June, once the candidate fields come into clearer view across the country.

Elections that feature a "significant difference" between the candidates on energy and climate issues, "something important" at stake and the potential to make a "longer term impact" are the ones in which Steyer plans to spend, he said.

How will he judge the success (or failure) of his spending? It's all about the W's.

"You've got to realize how deeply superficial I am," Steyer said. "I spent my life up to 22 playing a lot of sports so I really care about wins. I don't think there's any way you look at elections and don't look at it in terms of wins and losses. We really like W's."

Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Jaime Fuller · April 23, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.