The Washington Post

Mitch McConnell is going to crush Matt Bevin today. Here’s why.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has some big things to worry about in his reelection campaign. (Read: his unpopularity and the threat of Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes.) But on this primary day, businessman Matt Bevin (R) isn't one.

[posttv url="" ]

The only thing in doubt when the polls close in Kentucky tonight is McConnell's margin of victory over his tea party foe, who recent polls show is trailing by 20 to 30 points. So how is McConnell so well-positioned despite the fact tea partiers have been itching to unseat him for years? Three reasons: Bevin fizzled badly, McConnell made no major missteps and a well-stocked cavalry came in to help him.

Let's look at these factors one at a time.

1. Bevin stumbled. Again and again. 

Flash back to August of 2013. Things were looking up for Bevin. He gave a well-received speech at the annual Fancy Farm picnic. He was starting to catch the eye of national tea party groups. But his promise would be short-lived — in large part because of distractions he could have avoided.

Bevin suggested that legalizing gay marriage could lead to parents being able to marry their children in a February radio interview. He spoke at a pro-cockfighting rally. He was repeatedly dogged by his past support for the TARP bank bailout program that he bashes these days. On and on it went. (And, yes, credit for it going on and on goes to McConnell's opposition research team.)

To convince voters to fire a long-serving incumbent requires more than just persuading them the other guy is awful. You have to be a palatable-enough alternative. Time and time again, Bevin fell short of making that case as he veered off-message, and doubts arose about his own limited record.

2. McConnell didn't make any major screw-ups. 

When Dick Lugar lost in the Indiana GOP Senate primary in 2012, there was a laundry list of reasons why it happened. He thumbed his nose at the tea party. He failed to put to rest concerns about his residency. He was writing op-eds about foreign policy in the Wall Street Journal when that was the last thing Republican primary voters back home cared about.

McConnell learned the lessons of Lugar's loss. He secured the support of tea party hero Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) early on and hired a former Paul aide to run his campaign. He spent more than $9 million and didn't get caught back on his heels the way Lugar did. And he didn't give Bevin much in the way of new fodder with his public comments and maneuverings in the Senate during the past few months.

3. The cavalry came in for McConnell. 

Former McConnell hand Scott Jennings advised a nonprofit and a super PAC aligned with McConnell that spent millions on the campaign. The Chamber of Commerce spent more than $1 million on McConnell's behalf. Sure, Bevin had the Senate Conservatives Fund in his corner and spent more than $3 million from his own campaign in the race, all as McConnell was also taking heat from Democratic groups. But it was no match overall for McConnell and his allies. The era of tailor-made super PACs and nonprofits especially benefits candidates like McConnell, who have lots of well-funded allies.

Sean Sullivan has covered national politics for The Washington Post since 2012.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.