The Washington Post

President Obama (finally) bends to the realities of political Washington

President Obama did something he detests today: He bent to the will of political Washington.

[posttv url="" ]


Obama fired Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki -- in official-speak, Shinseki offered his resignation and Obama accepted it -- amid a hail of calls for Shinseki's removal from both sides of Capitol Hill and a media feeding frenzy about when/if the VA head would/should go. But, in his remarks announcing the news Obama made quite clear that removing Shinseki was something he did with a heavy heart. "Ric’s commitment to our veterans is unquestioned," said Obama. "His service to our country is exemplary. I am grateful for his service, as are many veterans across the country."  Later, he added: "I want to reiterate, [Shinseki] is a very good man. I don’t just mean he’s an accomplished man. I don’t just mean that he’s been an outstanding soldier. He’s a good person who’s done exemplary work on our behalf."

So, why did Obama get rid of someone for whom he quite clearly has considerable respect and even considered a personal friend? Because Obama recognized that as much as he might hate the chattering class in Washington and nervous nelly politicians constantly fretting about what problems within his administration might mean for their own re-election races, this was an instance in which political Washington was right.

To that end, it's interesting to note the differences between how Obama handled the calls for the resignation of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in the wake of the bungled rollout of and how he approached the scandal surrounding the wait times for veterans to get care at VA facilities around the country.

This chart  -- built by the one and only Philip Bump -- tells one aspect of that story pretty compellingly.


See all those blue squares and circles?  That's all of the Democrats -- including the like of House campaign chief Steve Israel and virtually every Democratic Senator in a swing state up for reelection in 2014 -- who had called for Shinseki to resign, a number that soared this week in the wake of a preliminary report from the Veterans Affairs Inspector General that identified systemic failures up and down the VA chain of command.  See how there are no blue squares or circles on the Sebelius side?

And, remember that the problems surrounding came in mid to late 2013 (not an election year) and came on an issue -- the Affordable Care Act -- that had already been politicized within an inch of its life. Not so, the VA problems.  The scandal broke into the public view less than seven months before a midterm election that already doesn't look good for Democrats nationally. And, it centered on an issue -- ensuring that those who put their lives on the line for the country are taken care of as they age -- that lacks any obvious partisan line-drawing.

All of the above meant that Obama could -- and, for his political legacy, probably needed to -- keep Sebelius on the job until started running smoothly and she could be sent off on good news (8 million signups under the federal exchange). Obama lacked that luxury with Shinseki due to the timing of the scandal and its nature.

A sacrifice had to be made -- and Obama understood that. Shinseki had to go -- not just because that's what political Washington wanted but because real people affected by the VA's screwups needed some evidence that the people at the top were being held accountable. Had Shinseki hung on, the talk of the Sunday shows would have focused on why Obama hadn't jettisoned him and what that said about the president's style of leadership and his willingness to hold people accountable for their mistakes. The story seemed  -- and seems -- likely to get worse before it gets better and it was hard to see how keeping Shinseki in his job for another week or month would help -- and very clear how it could hurt.

This was a political boil that needed lancing and Obama, who, when he needs to be, is a political pragmatist extraordinaire, did the deed. But, he made clear he didn't like doing it.

Chris Cillizza writes “The Fix,” a politics blog for the Washington Post. He also covers the White House.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.