The Washington Post

Bashar al-Assad’s election results are actually pretty bad for an autocrat

This post has been updated. Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad's broad margin of victory in his country's most recent "election" — 88.7 percent, according to reports — is the sort of thing that would make most American politicians jealous. (Especially a few politicians in Mississippi.) But for an autocrat, it's actually a pretty lame showing.

Kim Jong-Un (C) visiting the construction site of apartment houses in Pyongyang. (AFP PHOTO / KCNA / Getty Images)

Here's where Assad stacks up against some of the world's greatest "election" winners this century.

Rank Winner Year Percentage
10. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran 2009 62.6 percent
9. Hugo Chavez, Venezuela 2006 62.8
8. Vladimir Putin, Russia 2012 64
7. Vladimir Putin, Russia 2004 71.2
6. Bashar al-Assad, Syria 2014 88.7
5. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, Egypt 2014 96.9
4. Fidel Castro, Cuba 2003 99
3. Kim Jong Il, North Korea 2009 99.9

And then there are the cream of the crop, the most robustly supported authoritarian leaders we've seen in recent history.

Rank Winner Year Percentage
1. (tied) Kim Jong Un, North Korea 2014 100
1. (tied) Saddam Hussein, Iraq 2002 100

As the BBC article about Hussein's remarkable "achievement" states: "[t]he government insists the count was fair and accurate." Of course it was.

For those of you rushing to figure out where Barack Obama and George W. Bush fall on this list, here you go. Obama got 52.9 percent and 51.1 percent. Bush got 47.9 and 50.7.

Philip Bump writes about politics for The Fix. He is based in New York City.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.