The Washington Post

No recent candidate has benefited from outside money as much as Chris McDaniel

Chris McDaniel will at this time Wednesday either be the likely next senator from Mississippi or an interesting footnote in American political history. If it's the latter, that footnote should include a key detail: McDaniel is probably the most significant beneficiary of outside campaign spending in recent political history.

Chris McDaniel. (AP Photo/George Clark)

A detail in a report on the race at NBC News jumped out at us:

As of June 4, Cochran had $407,574 in cash on hand, while McDaniel had $60,157. In contributions from June 4-23, Cochran raked in nearly $1.25 million vs. $181,000 for McDaniel. So if Cochran does indeed lose, it won’t be due to money. McDaniel’s campaign has been almost ENTIRELY bankrolled by outside groups.

That's a big imbalance, of course. But is it unusual? We pulled data from the Center for Responsive Politics' database of Federal Elections Commission filings to see.

There are two ways that outside groups try and influence elections. They can either spend money in support of a candidate (by, say, running a television ad saying, "Go vote for Chris McDaniel") or they can spend money to attack a candidate ("Don't vote for Thad Cochran because" something bad, etc.). The CPR database tracks both types of spending, on a candidate-by-candidate basis. It's imprecise, as a note on the site makes clear. But it provides a good sense of who is spending where.

We took the races in 2010, 2012 and 2014 in which outside groups spent $10 million or more and evaluated three dollar amounts for each of the top two candidates: how much the campaign itself spent, how much outside groups spent on behalf of that candidate, and how much outside groups spent against the candidate's opponent. Here's the result, in rough chronological order:

McDaniel is down there at the bottom, seemingly nothing impressive. What we were interested in, though, wasn't how far those bars stretched to the right. We wanted to know the ratio between outside spending and the candidate's own spending; that is, how much red there is next to a candidate versus the amount of blue. So we calculated that. We did it in two ways:

  • as a percentage of all spending for and by the two candidates in a race, and
  • as a percentage of the amount of money spent to help each candidate individually.

In both cases, McDaniel's campaign had the highest percentages of any of the races listed above.

Of all of the spending in the Mississippi Senate primary, 41.74 percent has been to boost McDaniel or in opposition to his opponent, Sen. Thad Cochran. 83.09 percent of the money that's benefited McDaniel has been from outside groups -- meaning that they've outspent his campaign by a factor of four-to-one. When NBC says, "McDaniel’s campaign has been almost ENTIRELY bankrolled by outside groups," that's what they mean.

It's very possible that this isn't specific to McDaniel, however. Note the campaign that comes in second in terms of the percentage of spending from outside groups: that of Rep. David Jolly, elected to Congress from Florida earlier this year. In both cases, these were unusual elections that gained national attention -- the sort of race where outside groups often get involved.

And, of course, both happened after the giant spike in outside spending that began in 2010, as the CRP notes. McDaniel's footnote might not only be about how much he got from outside groups. It may also be that he was on the front end of that trend.

Philip Bump writes about politics for The Fix. He is based in New York City.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Aaron Blake · June 24, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.