The Washington Post

Re-re-re-debunking the Benghazi ‘stand down’ rumors

Hillary Clinton testifies about the Benghazi attacks in January 2013. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

Testimony from closed-door interviews with military leaders who were stationed in Tripoli on the night of September 11, 2012, should lay to rest the rumor that American forces were told to "stand down" instead of traveling to Benghazi to assist in repelling the terror attacks that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other men. But it almost certainly won't lay the rumor to rest, since the testimony was already essentially public.

The Associated Press reported on Thursday that there was an order given "to remain in Tripoli and protect some three dozen embassy personnel rather than fly to Benghazi some 600 miles away after all Americans there would have been evacuated" -- an order that has been mischaracterized, according to the officers involved.

We knew this. In February, the House Armed Services Committee -- chaired by Republican Rep. Buck McKeon -- released a report that made that point clearly.

The testimony reported by the AP appears to have been the same testimony that helped inform the House committee report.

There is an ancillary "stand down" rumor involving CIA officers stationed at the secondary, annex facility in Benghazi when the main compound came under attack. But that has been addressed, too. The Senate Intelligence Committee released a report in January making that point.

In fact, the CIA took the unusual step of rejecting this claim on the record in November of 2012. It released a statement that read, in part: "[N]o one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate." And, to CNN: "There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support."

When Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) suggested that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had given such an order, the Post's Glenn Kessler walked through the evidence against the idea, which is lengthy. Issa's claim is nonetheless revelatory: The rumors persist because Benghazi is and will remain a potent political topic until Hillary Clinton is or isn't elected president in November 2016.

And so, even after the AP story was making the rounds, there were tweets like this:

Philip Bump writes about politics for The Fix. He is based in New York City.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
From clubfoot to climbing: Double amputee lives life of adventure
Learn to make traditional soup dumplings
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Play Videos
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
The rise and fall of baseball cards
How to keep your child safe in the water
Play Videos
'Did you fall from heaven?': D.C.'s pick-up lines
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
How to get organized for back to school
How to buy a car via e-mail
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Jeff Simon · July 10, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.