Over the years, there has been a lot written about Wikipedia edits – from the mundane to more serious accusations of revisionist history – originating from sources within Congress. In 2006, the Lowell Sun broke the story of a Hill staffer editing the Wikipedia entry of his boss, whose broken campaign promises were deleted while glossy biographical details were added.
A newly formed Twitter account has automated the process of revealing those changes. @Congressedits is based on a similar account devoted to the British Parliament. The IP addresses are fairly easy to come by, and it uses a script similar to what you might accomplish with an "If This Then That" command to send notifications to Twitter.
While @Congressedits doesn't identify individual staffers or offices, it has uncovered some ... uh ... interesting uses of congressional time.
Someone edited Heritage Foundation fellow Brian Darling's Wikipedia page to add that he was involved with breeding rare long-haired cats as a child. Fascinating!
One close reader of U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Administrator Rajiv Shah's page changed "22 billion dollars" to "$22 billion," which we have to admit is a genuine public service to those of us who are OCD about edits.
There's also the
Blake Farenthold anonymous staffer who added Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Tex.) to the Wiki page for Corpus Christi, Tex. (Incidentally, this person also messed up the code on the page and had to go back in to fix it.)
If you aren't already following the account, it may be worth it for the same reason you might monitor Sunlight Foundation's Politwoops page, which tracks the deleted tweets of politicians and has become an invaluable accountability resource.
[This post has been updated to fix a typo and clarify how the @Congressedits account sends notifications via Twitter.]