The Washington Post

Almost no one is voting in the 2014 elections. Not even in some of the hottest races.


Of the 123 million people eligible to vote in the country's primaries so far, only 18 million have bothered to do so -- 14.6 percent, according to analysis from the Center for the Study of the American Electorate reported by the Associated Press. That's not all registered voters, mind you, but every American who could vote. But didn't.

We were curious, though, if that held up for some of the most closely watched races in the country. The AP is deliberate about noting that campaign spending is soaring even as more than half of primary states saw record low turnout. But that spending is soaring only in select races.

We looked at turnout for nine federal races: Senate primaries in Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina, Nebraska, Mississippi, and Iowa; House primaries in Idaho-2, Virginia-7; and the California governor's race. Cutting to the chase, turnout was up slightly over the 2010 primary in three races and down significantly in five. (We couldn't determine turnout in Mississippi in 2010 by the time this post was filed, but it seems almost certain that the 2014 run-off between Sen. Thad Cochran and Chris McDaniel topped it.) The states that saw turnout fall saw it fall, on average, by 6.35 percent. Where it rose, it rose by 3.6 percent.

Time for caveats. This is a very small sample size from all of the country's primary races. But we can still learn some interesting things.

For example, there doesn't appear to have been much correlation between how much money was spent in the race and how much turnout changed.


But races that saw an increase in turnout were more likely to be close. This makes sense, of course; more interesting races where votes make more of a difference are more likely to get people to go to the polls. (The dotted line is the trend.)


Perhaps the secret, then, is to have more races be close? Just spitballing here.

Since we had the data, we went ahead and looked at the relationship between the margin of victory and how much was spent. We looked at two scenarios, spending by candidate in the nine races and all spending, including outside money. There wasn't much of a relationship between how much you spent and how big you won.

Then we took out the two outliers -- Virginia-7, where Rep. Eric Cantor vastly outspent David Brat, and the California governor's race, where Jerry Brown romped without spending anything at all. In these, there was more of a relationship between how much was spent and how big the margin of victory.


But again, small sample size. Overall, though, it's hard to be skeptical about the Center for the Study of the American Electorate's findings. What gets people to vote is a close, interesting race. In a lot of places, that simply doesn't happen.

Philip Bump writes about politics for The Fix. He is based in New York City.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race
Most Read
Failed to render /WEB-INF/jsp/features/most/sidebar/feature.jsp. Cause: An exception occurred processing JSP page /WEB-INF/jsp/features/most/sidebar/feature.jsp at line 116 113: ${globemail} 114: 115: 116: <%=list.get(0) %> 117: 118: 119: <%=list.get(1) %> Stacktrace:. See Server Logs for detail.



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.