The Washington Post

All Iraq, all the time on the Sunday shows


Kurdish pesh merga troops participate in an intensive security deployment against Islamic State militants in a village on the outskirts of the Iraqi province of Nineveh on Saturday. (Ari Jalal/Reuters)

Lawmakers weighed in on U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq this week, with Democrats supporting the president's agenda of limited involvement while Republicans said more action is needed to stop militants who threaten the United States.

"Only Iraq can save Iraq," Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "There is so much that we can do to help the Iraqis help themselves, but ultimately, they have to save their own country."

Durbin said expanding U.S. military involvement in Iraq was "not in the cards," citing public opposition to such a move.

"Neither the American people nor Congress are in the business of wanting to escalate this conflict beyond where it is today," he said. "I think the president's made it clear this is a limited strike. He has, I believe, most congressional support for that at this moment. To go beyond is really going to be a challenge."

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) said during an appearance on CBS's "Face the Nation" that the airstrikes have been successful in destroying heavy artillery, disrupting convey communication lines and making it easier for Kurdish forces to fight back against the Islamic State.

"I think these targeted strikes are very effective," he said. "The Kurds are very aggressive.  With this support, I think they will be able to stabilize the situation in the north."

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) dismissed the notion that Iraq could handle the situation itself.

"We need to go on offense," he said "Fox News Sunday." "There is no force within the Mideast that can neutralize or contain or destroy ISIS without at least American air power." The Islamic State was formerly called the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS.

Both Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) called for an escalation in U.S. involvement. McCain told CNN's "Meet the Press" that the United States should expand airstrike targets to include Islamic State elements in Syria, and provide training and supplies to those fighting against the militants, while King said on "Meet the Press" that the United States must do "whatever we have to do" to stop the Islamic State.

"ISIS is a direct threat to the United States of America," King said. "They are more powerful now than al-Qaeda was on 9/11."

Republicans, including King, attributed the rise of the Islamic State to failure on the part of the Obama administration, but Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) said during an appearance on "Fox News Sunday" that the blame falls on Iraq.

"If you're looking at what the real cause here, the real cause is that the Iraqi government has not formed the way it should to protect the rights of all Iraqis," he said. "We are not going to get in the middle of a civil war and use American military where it should be Iraqis taking care of their own needs.

[posttv url="http://www.washingtonpost.com/posttv/world/middle_east/hagel-islamic-state-is-threat-to-civilized-world/2014/08/11/e80bcffd-87a5-48f1-8a32-c9ab5f404420_video.html" ]

Hunter Schwarz covers the intersection of politics and pop culture for the Washington Post

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.