Here's a rundown of what Sanders said, compared with what Trump has said:
“Conceptually, he still supports raising the age [for all gun purchases] to 21. But he also knows there's not a lot of broad support for that. But that's something he would support. ... I think he thinks it would probably have more potential in the states than it would at the federal level.”
Trump on Wednesday pressed lawmakers repeatedly on inserting this into federal legislation. A sampling:
- On Sens. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) and Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), who spearheaded the failed 2013 effort to expand background checks: “I think if we’re going to use you as a base, the two of you, I think you’re going to have to iron out that problem. Because I’m asked that question more than almost any other question: 'Are you going to 21 or not?' Okay?”
- “So you have a case right now where somebody can buy a handgun at 21. Now, this is not a popular thing to say, in terms of the NRA, but I’m saying it anyway. I’m going to just have to say it.”
- “But you can’t buy a handgun at 18, 19 or 20. You have to wait until you’re 21. But you can buy the gun — the weapon used in this horrible shooting — at 18.”
- “We also want things that can be approved. You have to look at the age of 21 with certain types of weapons. I mean, some people aren’t going to like that, but you’re going to have to look at that very seriously.”
Trump suggested repeatedly that raising the age limit was a matter of political will and doing the right thing, even if the NRA doesn't like it. Now Sanders is suggesting it might be too difficult — despite a CNN poll this week showing 71 percent of Americans favor the change (it was also 78 percent in Florida in a Quinnipiac poll). That just doesn't make sense.
On what Trump supports on background checks: “Not necessarily universal background checks but certainly improving the background check system. He wants to see what that legislation, the final piece of it looks like. 'Universal' means something different to a lot of people. He certainly wants to focus and improve on the background check system.”
While Trump hasn't explicitly called for universal background checks, he has suggested he supports a massive expansion of them. Trump on Wednesday lamented that the Toomey-Manchin bill, which would have expanded background checks to online sales and gun shows, didn't pass. He suggested President Barack Obama didn't push hard enough for it.
In another exchange with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Trump suggested strongly that he would push for universal background checks:
MURPHY: Ninety-seven percent of Americans want universal background checks. In states that have universal background checks, there are 35 percent less gun murders than in states that don’t have them. And yet, we can’t get it done. There’s nothing else like that, where it works, people want it, and we can’t do it.THE PRESIDENT: But you have a different president now.SENATOR MURPHY: Well, listen —THE PRESIDENT: You went through a lot of presidents, and you didn’t get it done. You have a different president. And I think, maybe, you have a different attitude, too. I think people want to get it done.
Elsewhere in the meeting, Trump said, “You have to [be] very, very powerful on background checks; don’t be shy.” He also said he wanted something “really strong on background checks.”
The one background-checks bill Trump has voiced support for — a bipartisan bill sponsored by Murphy and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) to improve information-sharing — is much more limited, even by the admissions of Cornyn and other senators who support it.
On whether Trump's tariffs decision is final: “This is something he's wanted to do for a while. Never say never, but I think he's pretty committed to moving this forward.”
“Never say never?” The president announced Thursday that he would impose a 25 percent tariff on steel imports and a 10 percent tariff on aluminum imports. But he didn't announce those percentages until the end of an event, when reporters asked him about it. That led to suggestions that maybe those numbers weren't ready for public consumption. And judging by Sanders's comments — including at Thursday's press briefing, in which she said of the 25 percent figure, “I think that's the intent” — that may be the case.
But here's the thing: This announcement sent the markets plunging. It inflamed tensions with China and the European Union. And now Sanders is suggesting there's a possibility — however small — that it might not be ironclad. That's a hell of a way to do business.
Of course, it's pretty par for the course with Trump, as Sanders tacitly admitted Friday.