The Washington Post

Hackers have the names and Social Security numbers of Ferguson police. But should they share them?

A promotional image for Anonymous’s #OpFerguson. (Twitter)

David, a.k.a. Pharaoh, doesn’t hold a political office or opine for CNN. But this week, the 14-year-old hacker mounted what might have been one of the more personally damaging attacks against Ferguson, Mo.’s embattled police department: the name — and the address, and the Social Security number — of St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar.

A redacted screenshot of Pharaoh’s Belmar dox, which appeared on the dark Web site Doxbin. (Doxbin)

That’s not all. Pharaoh, a self-proclaimed member of the loosely affiliated hacker collective Anonymous, has also obtained the name and Social Security number of a Ferguson police officer he believes was involved in 18-year-old Michael Brown’s fatal shooting last weekend. The Ferguson Police Department has said that name is not correct — though that doesn’t faze Pharaoh.

“The Ferguson PD actually tweeted at us saying that this is not the officer responsible for the murder,” Pharaoh said in a lengthy chat via IRC, Anonymous’s preferred communication platform. “But they could be lying.”

And if they’re not?

“There would be no collateral damage if the government would be answerable to its citizens,” another Anonymous member said.

This is the central paradox at the heart of “doxing,” a form of vigilante Internet justice that has surfaced in almost every national debate, scandal and tragedy of the past three years. The practice — deployed, in its purest and most high-profile form, by Anonymous — involves exposing the personal information of targeted individuals, often so that the public can harass them. Anonymous claims it is forcing transparency and putting power back in the hands of ordinary people. Police, and other critics, point out that doxing often amounts to little more than a mob-style witch hunt … and that Anonymous, not infrequently, gets its targets wrong.

Just this morning, the Twitter account @TheAnonMessage — one of Anonymous’s more popular mouthpieces, with more than 75,000 followers — tweeted the name of a “guilty” Ferguson police officer who, it later turned out, actually works in another town entirely. Twitter quickly suspended the account, but a replacement, @TheAnonMessage2, sprang up in its place.

“The powers that be will stop at nothing to silence us,” that account tweeted, later adding: “I’m not the only one with the dox … who’s to say someone else will release them?”

That idea — that everyone is potentially responsible, and thus nobody is — is central to Anonymous’s core ethical code, such as it exists. In psychology, this phenomenon falls in the same realm as the bystander effect: When responsibility is diffused among a network of people, no one individual feels accountable if/when something goes wrong.

For Anonymous, where even minor undertakings are crowdsourced among groups of faceless hackers, that’s particularly true: One faction gets the alleged officer’s name, another cross-references his identity against databases like Thomson Reuters’s Clear, and another undertakes the actual doxing. From there, more shadowy characters, none of them named — even, in most cases, among themselves — will publicize the information, max out the officer’s credit card or order 100 pizzas to his house. (That little stunt is called pizza-bombing, and it’s a lot less fun than it sounds.)

To Pharaoh, this is a morally justifiable process; he says he “trusts the other guys,” even if he doesn’t know them well. But what if, I ask him, he publishes the Social Security number of an innocent man, and it totally wrecks that guy’s life?

“You must remember that I was not directly involved with the people who found him or blamed him,” Pharaoh said. “I’m just his ‘doxer,’ I guess.” On Twitter, Pharaoh was little more strident:

Pharaoh is also not alone in believing that there’s a higher purpose in his work; that innocent people, doxed undeservedly, are essentially “collateral damage” in Anonymous’s larger war against government overreach. After all, there’s no doubt that power in Ferguson lies, unreservedly, with the police — to the detriment of free speech, free assembly and, some have argued, justice. Hacking is an opportunity, Anonymous argues, to seize justice back for the people. But even given that context, it doesn’t mean that doxing is morally all right.

“When doxing knowingly exposes others to a significant risk of dangerous vigilante action, it is unethical, for reasons that should be plain,” said Shannon Vallor, an associate professor of philosophy at Silicon Valley’s Santa Clara University. “But in cases such as Ferguson and Steubenville [the site of a controversial rape case], the unethical act arises partly from the perception that there are powerful thumbs on the scales of justice. You can try to stop it from happening by technical or legal means, but the most effective prevention is probably to keep your thumb off the scale.”

Until things in Ferguson are that simple, Pharaoh is sitting on some very valuable information.

Audio from the St. Louis County police dispatch was released Wednesday by Anonymous. The audio is from Aug. 9, when a Ferguson, Mo., police officer shot and killed Michael Brown, an unarmed teenager. (YouTube: Anonymous)
Caitlin Dewey is The Post’s digital culture critic. Follow her on Twitter @caitlindewey or subscribe to her daily newsletter on all things Internet. (



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
From clubfoot to climbing: Double amputee lives life of adventure
Learn to make traditional soup dumplings
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Play Videos
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
The rise and fall of baseball cards
How to keep your child safe in the water
Play Videos
'Did you fall from heaven?': D.C.'s pick-up lines
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
How to get organized for back to school
How to buy a car via e-mail
The signature drink of New Orleans
Next Story
Caitlin Dewey · August 14, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.