Merriam-Webster’s definition? “An utterly calamitous or mismanaged situation or occurrence.”
A lot has happened for the dumpster fire in the 10 years since Urban Dictionary first took a crack at defining it. In that short span of time, a “dumpster fire” has become a metaphor for, say, what it’s like to be alive and online in the present day. A dumpster fire is simply understood, immediately recognizable. It has its own viral — and at this point, way overused — GIF:
And these reasons are why the dumpster fire was a perfect candidate for inclusion in Merriam-Webster, Sokolowski said in a Tuesday interview.
When considering which words and phrases to define, lexicographers “look for the removal of linguistic white gloves,” Sokolowski said, meaning it’s no longer a rare species. When the word or phrase appears in, say, a news article with an explanation of its meaning, then it’s on the cusp. What the dictionary makers look for is what comes next, when the “writer presumes that the reader knows what it means.”
In dictionary time, a decade is a really short span between first usage and a dictionary entry. But there are some that have made the leap even faster. “Initial coin offering” and “manspreading” are both new dictionary entries in Merriam-Websters’s online version. And both originated in 2014.
“That shows incredibly fast — you might say viral — spreading of the terms,” Sokolowski said.
And the term “dumpster fire” has become a meme. “If you’re a meme, if the word itself expresses a meme, then it spreads like wildfire.”
How did it spread? I searched for tweets before 2008 that mention the term, and of the few that weren’t about literal dumpster fires, I found a handful about sports, such as, “That team is a dumpster fire. Who knew that you were alowwed [sic] to bench your QB?” There were a few other uses. One person tweeted in 2008 that traffic was “a dumpster fire,” and another commented on how much he liked the phrase itself: “I just really like the term ‘dumpster fire.’ As in, ‘man, that guy is just a dumpster fire.’ It’s just a really funny way of saying ‘uh oh.’ ”
By 2010, Sports Twitter really loved the dumpster fire. “My picks are turning into a nuclear waste and tire dumpster fire,” wrote one Twitter user, apparently disappointed by his fantasy team. Another tweet reads: “the Kings, such a dumpster fire. worst team in the league.” Other teams that were “dumpster fires” that year included the Cleveland Browns, the New York Jets, the New Jersey Devils and the Washington Capitals. Chances are, if you were tweeting about dumpster fires in 2010 that were not literally dumpsters on fire, then you were tweeting about sports.
That matched the searches Sokolowski and I ran in Nexis, a database of news article archives. Through 2012, most of the articles about dumpster fires were easily about dumpsters that were on fire. However, one 2011 newspaper article from the Times Herald in Port Huron, Mich., about Big Ten football contained the following: “I think Ohio State is at the bottom of that list, but the Buckeyes spend so much time rotating between competent team and dumpster fire it’s tough to tell.”
In 2010, the Winnipeg Free Press wrote that “The Chargers are in the midst of pulling their season out of a dumpster fire and this gets them in the clear.”
But the real shift came before the 2016 elections, when the dumpster fire’s use as a metaphor for the elections was so widely used that it prompted an oral history in the Daily Beast. ” Things are bad everywhere, always, and forever,” writer Erin Gloria Ryan said. “But if you read a description of the degree to which things have been bad in the world of politics lately, you’re likely to see two words: dumpster fire.”
That rapid rise is reflected pretty well in Google Trends’s history of the phrase, which shows a spike upward in interest around October 2015.
If anything, dumpster fire’s introduction to the dictionary comes after its most recent peak as a metaphor, which isn’t something that really bothers Sokolowski. “We’re not chasing slang. We’re not trying to be something we’re not. We’re not trying to be Urban Dictionary,” he said.
Later, he added: “If a word is used by some people, it should be in a dictionary for all people.”