The FISA court got really upset when the NSA didn’t tell the truth on surveillance


The hall that allegedly houses the FISA court. (Lindsay Young)

For weeks, we've all been trying to determine whether the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is a rubber stamp or an effective check on the NSA's broad surveillance powers. The Obama administration insists that FISC's existence is evidence that the system works. Critics of the court say it is either complicit with the NSA or powerless to resist it.

New documents released by Obama's top spy today offer ammunition to the critics.

In a 2011 court opinion, the FISA court repeatedly accuses the NSA not only of failing to comply with the rules, but of misleading it outright.


(U.S. government)

Here's a footnote in the same document saying much the same thing:


(U.S. government)

The footnote amounts to a court admission that it had been allowing the NSA to proceed for years without a full understanding of the surveillance program. On the next page, the court suggested that the NSA breached criminal law and threatened to follow up with a separate court order:


(U.S. government)

These passages underscore previous statements by the FISA court's presiding judge, Reggie Walton, arguing that FISC only has a limited ability to investigate abuse and can only make decisions based on information the NSA provides.

This document suggests that the FISA court is not the rigorous check on NSA abuses that the Obama administration has claimed it is.

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on telecommunications and the Internet. Before joining the Post, he was the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic.

business/technology

the-switch

Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Comments
Show Comments
Most Read Business

business/technology

the-switch

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Next Story
Andrea Peterson · August 21, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.