The Washington Post

Election officials say mobile political ads must come with disclaimers

The Federal Election Commission is deadlocked on whether to exempt mobile ads from the disclaimers that appear by law on political messaging — throwing a wrench in the plans of a left-leaning communications firm and pitting its strategists against the FEC's Democratic appointees.

The firm in question is Revolution Messaging, whose clients include, Organizing for America and various Democratic committees. Last fall, Revolution asked the FEC for permission to eliminate disclaimers from its digital banner ads, arguing that the small screens on mobile devices made it impractical to include the legalese. Republican officials sided with Revolution, saying that a disclaimer was unnecessary; Democratic commissioners disagreed.

A second, softer proposal had Revolution committing to shortened disclaimers. According to head of digital advertising Keegan Goudiss, "a couple of Democratic commissioners seemed open" to the idea. But on Thursday, those officials voted against it, resulting in an inconclusive 3-3 split on the panel. (Four votes are required to approve a measure.)

"Mobile phone advertisements, which may be disseminated on a national scale to voters, are clearly general public political advertising and do not warrant special exemption from disclaimer requirement," several of the commissioners wrote in a statement.

In an interview, Goudiss said the decision — or lack thereof — will limit Revolution Messaging's options.

"There are certain things we want to do, like put vote reminders on people's calendars, that we won't be able to do," he said, "because vendors will say, 'There's not enough to cover us here.'"

The FEC offers a selective exemption for "small items" like buttons and bumper stickers that don't provide the space for a disclaimer. There's also an impracticality exemption for skywriting and other forms of large, public messaging.

But political advertisers could easily accommodate the limitations of a small banner ad, the FEC suggested. Strategists might consider taking out larger ads, it said, or they could link ads to a separate landing page with the required disclaimer.

This isn't the first time the FEC has struggled to rule on technological campaign elements. In 2010, the commission split on whether to require Google to attach disclaimers to political ads generated in search results. Despite not reaching a consensus in that vote, either, the commission said informally that omitting the disclaimers was not against the law.

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on telecommunications and the Internet. Before joining the Post, he was the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.
Next Story
Brian Fung · February 27, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.