The Washington Post

AT&T threatens to boycott a critical airwave auction. Is it bluffing?

(Rick Wilking / Reuters)

AT&T is warning it may have no choice but to pull out of a major government auction of the airwaves if the Federal Communications Commission doesn't change some of the rules.

On the one hand, the prospect of an AT&T boycott should have regulators worried — the FCC stands to lose millions if not billions of dollars in revenue from AT&T if it backs out — but it's hard to see how AT&T could justify passing up a rare opportunity to purchase some of the most valuable aerial real estate in the industry.

Radio spectrum is finite. As the invisible stuff that carries cellphone calls, TV signals and satellite transmissions over the air, spectrum is high in demand among businesses. The upcoming auction would transfer spectrum currently used by TV stations to the government, which will then sell the reclaimed spectrum to wireless carriers.

At issue here are the limits the FCC is considering applying to large wireless carriers in an effort to make sure smaller companies, such as Sprint and T-Mobile, get a fair chance in the auction. Under this plan, the FCC would set aside a portion of the airwaves that AT&T and Verizon won't be allowed to buy.

AT&T naturally dislikes the idea. In a letter to the FCC, AT&T's head of federal regulatory issues, Joan Marsh, wrote that the spectrum caps would "put AT&T in an untenable position, forcing AT&T to reevaluate its potential participation in the auction."

"AT&T has never declined to participate in a major spectrum auction and certainly did not intend to do so here,” Marsh added. “But if the restrictions as proposed are adopted, AT&T will need to seriously consider whether its capital and resources are directed toward other spectrum opportunities that will better enable AT&T to continue to support high quality LTE network deployments to serve its customers.”

Withdrawing from the auction would deal a huge blow to the FCC, which needs to raise enough money from the auction to pay for, among other things, a congressionally-mandated next-gen wireless network dedicated to first responders. That system alone is expected to cost $7 billion.

If AT&T is threatening to sit out the auction, it's a good bet Verizon — which also opposes the caps — could do the same. A spokesperson for the company did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

But Verizon has the luxury of being the second mover: It can afford to wait and see how AT&T's message is received. In some ways, the threat of a threat from Verizon may be even more fearsome to the FCC than actually making one, analysts said.

Jeff Silva, a former telecom policy analyst at Medley Global Advisors, said following through on the warning would be hard to explain to investors.

"They have to think long and hard whether it's in their corporate interest," Silva said. "This is the last big auction for a long, long time. There's nothing on the drawing board that's anywhere comparable to what they're going to be doing in the incentive auction."

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on telecommunications and the Internet. Before joining the Post, he was the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.
Next Story
Brian Fung · April 17, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.