The Washington Post

Why Apple is so interested in Beats: It’s not about the headphones

[posttv url="" ]


Apple is reportedly buying Beats Electronics for $3.2 billion — a whopping sum for a brand that, although popular, tends to be scoffed at by audiophiles.

So everyone wants to know: Why is Apple buying Beats when it could be investing in practically any other company?


One answer floating around is that Beats gives Apple valuable street cred among the cool kids. While Beats is undeniably cool, this theory seems hard to swallow. It's not like Apple is uncool.

More compelling is the idea that Apple wants to get its hands on Beats's technology. Some see the potential acquisition as play for Beats Music, Beats Electronics's streaming music service. As Peter Kafka over at Re/code points out:

If Apple wanted to, it could certainly have built a streaming subscription service itself; the company had been floating the notion of one with label executives in recent months. But it’s possible that Apple’s most recent attempts to extend its music business beyond the iTunes store helped convince [Apple CEO Tim] Cook that he was better off getting outside help.

[posttv url="" ]


This makes some sense considering Apple's habit of missing with online services. Before iCloud came along in 2011, Apple made three other attempts at building a cloud-based product. All of them saw mixed success. Part of the reason iCloud has stuck around so long is because Apple has integrated it into many of its products by default, much like Google has made Google Plus an underlying part of many services it offers. For instance, Apple's iOS requires customers to use iCloud as an intermediary when syncing address books to new Macs.

There's iTunes, of course, which helped Apple revolutionize the music sales industry. But the rise of streaming media, including Pandora and Spotify, threatens the idea of purchasing one-off singles. What's more, critics say iTunes has become a bloated piece of software that tries to do too much. Whenever Apple comes up with a new software feature and doesn't know where to put it, it gets shoved into iTunes.

Apple's lackluster track record with cloud-based offerings may suggest the company needs all the help it can get. (Why it didn't buy up a more prominent music streaming service, such as Spotify, is still a mystery.)

More broadly, Apple faces a long-term challenge. People turn to Apple for hardware — iPhones, iPads, and the like — but the future is all in online services. Ninety percent of Americans have a cellphone these days, and more than 60 percent own a smartphone. Sales of mobile devices are flagging. Wearable technology is still being refined.

Apple needs to find a winning formula in the cloud. And soon.

Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on telecommunications and the Internet. Before joining the Post, he was the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic.
Show Comments
Most Read
DJIA -0.08%
NASDAQ -0.35%
Last Update: 02/10/2016(DJIA&NASDAQ)



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.