The paper supports previous work about the link between mental health and aspects of physical health, from immune functioning to cognitive decline. The magnitude of the effect of loneliness appeared to be similar to that of other stressors, such as anxiety and job strain, and appeared to be similar for both men and women.
Nicole K. Valtorta, a researcher at the University of York, and her co-authors said their work “suggests that addressing loneliness and social isolation may have an important role in the prevention of two of the leading causes of morbidity in high-income countries.” She suggested interventions, such as educational programs, social activities and cognitive-behavioral therapy.
“Risk factors for loneliness and social isolation such as gender, socioeconomic position, bereavement and health status, are well-established and hold the key to identifying people who may benefit from intervention,” the researchers wrote.
Here is a flowchart of how social connections might impact your heart health and stroke risk, by Julianne Holt-Lunstad and Timothy B. Smith of Brigham Young University. They wrote an opinion piece accompanying Valtorta’s paper.
A study published last year by University of Chicago researchers said that loneliness may cause humans to fall apart at even the cellular level. They wrote that the emotion appears to increase activities in genes that produce inflammation and those that fight disease.
Psychologist John Cacioppo wrote in his book “Loneliness” that it is “a survival impulse” like hunger.
Cacioppo told the University of Chicago magazine that it's “a powerful evolutionary force binding prehistoric people to those they relied on for food, shelter and protection, to help them raise their young and carry on their genetic legacy.” He hypothesized that “the distress they felt if they drifted toward the outskirts of their group served as a warning to reengage or else perish.”
While Valtorta’s study is the first to conduct a systematic analysis of this data, it is limited by the fact the studies all used different criteria to determine whether someone has poor social relationships. Some papers used a loneliness measure, others a social isolation measure, and still others combined criteria. The review also included one paper from as far back as 1965, and given how much our management of heart disease has changed since then, it’s possible that that data may not really be relevant to modern-day patients.
The authors also noted that “we cannot infer causality from our findings, nor can we exclude confounding by unmeasured common causes, or reverse causation if deficiencies in social relationships are the result of subclinical disease.”