More than 5,000 community water systems in the United States reported violating the EPA's Lead and Copper Rule in 2015, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council. A much smaller number reported finding unacceptable levels of lead in water tests. (Natural Resources Defense Council)

If you think Flint, Mich., is the only place in the United States threatened by lead-contaminated water, think again.

The beleaguered city continues to grapple with the fallout of a drinking-water crisis that exposed its residents --  including 9,000 children 6 and younger -- to a toxic substance that can cause learning disabilities, behavioral problems and other serious health issues. But while Flint might be an extreme example, a report released Tuesday by the Natural Resources Defense Council details how many other communities around the country are failing to adequately ensure that their water supplies remain free of lead.

The report, which analyzed data from the Environmental Protection Agency, found that more than 18 million Americans are served by 5,363 water systems that in 2015 violated the federal rules governing lead testing. The violations included failures to properly monitor for lead, treat water to reduce corrosion in pipes or report testing results to the public or to regulators.

And the report found that despite more than 8,000 documented violations of the EPA's "Lead and Copper Rule," the agency took a formal enforcement action in only 908 cases. "This lack of accountability sends a clear message to water suppliers. ... There is no cop on the beat," the NRDC authors write.

"In almost 90 percent of cases, neither the states nor the EPA takes any formal enforcement action," said co-author Erik Olson, who directs the advocacy group's health programs. "The cop is sitting there watching everybody run stoplights and stop signs and never bothers to write anybody a ticket."

To be clear, the NRDC's analysis does not suggest that all 18 million people served by water systems with 2015 violations actually have excessive lead in their water. For starters, only a small number of taps in any community are tested for lead, and results can vary widely from home to home depending on the presence of lead pipes and lead-bearing fixtures. But Olson and others said that the sheer number of violations and lack of enforcement mean that "millions and millions of people are being put at risk."

In a statement Tuesday, the EPA said that ensuring access to safe drinking water for all Americans is “a top priority” and that the agency “remains committed to vigorous enforcement and compliance assistance to protect public health.”

Officials recognize "ongoing challenges in compliance" and are revising federal lead-testing regulations. They also are working closely with states -- which are "the first line of oversight of drinking water systems," the statement noted.

On the question of enforcement, the EPA said its response to specific violations varies. It can include technical or compliance assistance, issuing notices of violation or formal administrative or judicial enforcement actions. Many of the systems with violations in 2015 are working with state and federal regulators to resolve them, the agency said.

According to the NRDC, about 1,000 systems serving nearly 4 million people reported exceeding the EPA's "action level" of 15 parts per billion of lead in their drinking water between 2013 and 2015. That's a significant total but far fewer than the number with monitoring or reporting violations. Here's a map detailing places that had higher-than-acceptable lead levels in at least 10 percent of taps sampled:


(Natural Resources Defense Council)

In addition, 214 water systems failed last year to meet requirements to properly treat water with anti-corrosion chemicals that can reduce the threat of lead leaching into aging pipes and threatening health. Those systems, which serve nearly a half-million people, are represented in this map:


(Natural Resources Defense Council)

While Tuesday's analysis offers a troubling picture about the number of violations in EPA's database, NRDC officials said they also worry about what isn't getting reported. For instance, despite the national outrage that accompanied Flint's recent crisis, the city isn't among those listed as having violated federal lead-in-water standards in 2015.  That alone suggests that the scope of violations is likely much larger than the violations that get reported, the group argues.

"If Flint's extraordinary lead-contamination problems are not included in the EPA's official compliance data," the authors write, "how many other municipalities' serious lead problems are being swept under the rug?"

People both in and outside of the federal government have documented the under-reporting in the EPA's drinking water database. The agency -- burdened by budget woes, competing priorities and constant pressure from critics who want to strip it of regulatory authority -- has acknowledged that its data about violations is incomplete. That's partly because states, which have primary responsibility for enforcing lead-testing rules, often fail to report known violations to federal regulators, as required by law.

In a 2003 inquiry, launched after high lead levels were discovered in thousands of homes in Washington, the Government Accountability Office found that the EPA lacked recent test results for nearly a third of the nation’s largest water systems and lacked information about adherence to the regulations for more than 70 percent of community water systems. States simply were not reporting the information.

“EPA has been slow to take action on these data problems and, as a result, lacks the information it needs to evaluate how effectively the lead rule is being implemented and enforced nationwide,” the GAO report said.

"The states are supposed to be the first line of defense, and clearly they are falling down on the job," Olson said. "But it's EPA's job to oversee them, and if they're not doing their job, the EPA should be stepping in. And they are just not doing that."

Regulatory gaps also have allowed utilities to use questionable techniques such as "pre-flushing" taps or removing aerators from faucets to temporarily lower lead levels and avoid violating federal standards. Earlier this year, EPA officials sent letters to water officials in every state, saying they should cease using such methods.

There is broad agreement that major changes are overdue for the EPA's Lead and Copper Rule, which governs about 68,000 public water systems around the country. EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy has said the regulation "clearly needs to be strengthened," and the agency has vowed to overhaul the current rule in 2017. Yet it remains unclear what enforcement changes the EPA will propose.

The latest report advocates for speeding investments in the country's water infrastructure to remove the millions of lead service lines that remain underground -- a goal that will be difficult, costly and undoubtedly contentious. NRDC officials also are pushing for ongoing relief for Flint residents, updating and improving drinking water laws and giving a voice to the low-income, often minority communities that frequently bear the burden of environmental hazards such as lead in water.

"The bottom line is that lead is found in drinking water in cities well beyond Flint, often affecting vulnerable lower-income communities of color," NRDC President Rhea Suh said in announcing the findings of Tuesday's analysis. "Unsafe drinking water is a national problem that needs a national solution."

This post has been updated.

Read more:

The EPA’s lead-in-water rule has been faulted for decades. Will Flint hasten a change?

New data confirms that blood lead levels spiked in children in Flint, Mich.

Flint’s water crisis reveals government failures at every level

One city’s solution to drinking water contamination? Get rid of every lead pipe.

EPA questions Flint’s ability to provide clean water in the future, citing ‘systemic issues’

In U.S. drinking water, many chemicals are regulated — but many aren’t