Video of event on Cass Sunstein's new book, with commentary by Michael Cannon of the Cato Institute, and me.
How the law of interpretation sheds light on one of the most-used hypotheticals in legal interpretation.
The law of interpretation is mostly unwritten, but it's still law, and it covers a lot of different questions.
Will "Hamilton" change the way we interpret the Constitution?
An interesting new law review article about sex involving people suffering from dementia, as well as people who agree now to have someone have sex with them when they are unconscious later.
In siding with a transgender student, the 4th Circuit ignored controlling administrative law precedent.
Is the law of interpretation mindless? Is it going to solve all of our problems? Is it attacking a straw man? Is it just telling judges to do what they were doing anyway? Answers within.
So says the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, requiring an employer to investigate the "context" behind people wearing the insignia (even with no allegation that the wearers were saying anything racist).
The first problem: DePaul seems to think that speakers and audiences on its campus are in peril from thugs. The second, and more serious, problem: DePaul is responding by giving in to the (presumed) thugs.
Mao Zedong's Great Leap Forward was the biggest episode of mass murder in the history of the world. But it rarely gets the recognition it deserves.
