The Washington Post

Warnings that stop a crime vs. warnings that postpone it by a few seconds

Several commenters made variants of this argument: The government often warns people about enforcement of the law — e.g., by putting up signs telling people that the speed limit is photo enforced or radar enforced in a particular area. Likewise, people often laudably scare off criminals by telling them the police are coming. What’s the difference between that and warning someone to slow down because they see a police car?

I think there’s an important functional difference here. Speed limit enforcement signs genuinely tend to get people to drive within the law, at least so long as they are in that area. Scaring off a criminal tends to interrupt a crime, or prevent it from taking place. Headlight-flashing, on the other hand, gets people to abide by the law just for a few seconds, and in exchange makes it easier for people to evade punishment for their failure to abide by the law for all the rest of the time they drive in the area.

There’s also a difference in purpose. In the photo enforcement sign example and the scaring off the criminal example, the purpose of the warning is to prevent the crime. In the headlight-flashing example, the purpose of the warning is generally just to prevent apprehension.

Now what about the lookout, or for that matter the nonconfederate who happens to see the police coming and — without prearrangement — tells a drug dealer or graffiti painter to run off? There, the crime is indeed interrupted, and not just postponed by a few seconds, so the analysis might be different. Nonetheless, it seems to me that there is still a difference in purpose between someone whose purpose is to prevent the crime (and who may actually regret that the criminal will get off scot free) and someone whose purpose is to prevent the apprehension of a criminal. And obstruction of justice laws do indeed usually focus on the purpose, distinguishing those whose purpose it is to prevent apprehension from others.

Finally, some people pointed out that lookouts are often guilty of conspiracy, because they have a preexisting arrangement to serve as lookouts. But even people who warn that the police are coming, with the purpose of preventing apprehension, without any such earlier agreement can be guilty of obstruction of justice, and I think rightly so.

For more posts on this subject, see the original headlight flashing post and the friends and family post.

Eugene Volokh teaches free speech law, religious freedom law, church-state relations law, a First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic, and tort law, at UCLA School of Law, where he has also often taught copyright law, criminal law, and a seminar on firearms regulation policy.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Be a man and cry
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A flood of refugees from Syria but only a trickle to America
Chicago's tacos, four ways
Play Videos
What you need to know about filming the police
What you need to know about trans fats
Syrian refugee: 'I’m committed to the power of music'
Play Videos
Riding the X2 with D.C.'s most famous rapper
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Eugene Volokh · February 6, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.